[00:00:03]
>> YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO GET MY DEAL, PLEASE. GOOD EVENING.
[CALL TO ORDER]
IT IS 6:00 P.M AND WE ARE CONVENING THE PARKER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING.IT IS MARCH 19TH, 2024 AT 06:00 P.M. AT THIS TIME, I WILL ASK MR. OLSON, DO WE HAVE A QUORUM?
>> HAS ANYBODY HEARD FROM TODD? AT THIS TIME, WE WILL RECESS TO CLOSED EXECUTIVE SESSION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AUTHORITY
[EXECUTIVE SESSION START TO FINISH]
CONTAINED IN GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 551.074 PERSONNEL TO DELIBERATE THE APPOINTMENT, EMPLOYMENT EVALUATION, REASSIGNMENT, DUTIES, DISCIPLINE OR DISMISSAL OF A PUBLIC OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE.GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 551.0711, CONSULTATION WITH CITY ATTORNEY CONCERNING PENDING OR CONTEMPLATED LITIGATION.
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 551.0712, CONSULTATION WITH ATTORNEY ON A MANNER IN WHICH THE DUTY OF THE ATTORNEY TO THE GOVERNMENTAL BODY UNDER THE TEXAS DISCIPLINARY RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT OF THE STATE BAR OF TEXAS CLEARLY CONFLICTS WITH THIS CHAPTER, OPEN MEETINGS ACT.
AT THIS TIME, WE ARE IN RECESS TO EXECUTIVE SESSION.
IT IS 6:02 P.M. AND FOR THOSE OF YOU THAT ARE NEW, WE WILL LEAVE TO EXECUTIVE SESSION AND WE WILL BE BACK IT MAY BE 30 MINUTES, BUT IT WILL BE A LITTLE WHILE, BUT WE PROMISE WE'RE COMING BACK.
I'VE GOT ENOUGH. I CAN GO AHEAD AND RECONVENE.
AT THIS TIME, WE ARE RECONVENING THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF PARKER.
IT IS 719 ON MARCH 19TH, 2024.
AT THIS TIME, I WILL ASK IS THERE ANYTHING FROM EXECUTIVE SESSION TO BE DISCUSSED OR DECIDED?
>> THEN AT THIS TIME, WE WILL DO THE PLEDGES.
I WILL ASK MR. BIRKHOFF IF HE WOULD LEAD US IN THE AMERICAN PLEDGE.
IS THAT LUCY BACK THERE? LUCY, WOULD YOU LEAD US? SHE DOESN'T WANT TO LEAD US.
HOW ABOUT SERGEANT DIXON, WILL YOU LEAD US IN THE TEXAS PLEDGE? THANK YOU. WE HAVE A PUBLIC COMMENT.
[PUBLIC COMMENTS]
MOHAMMAD MIMEN, PLEASE COME UP TO THE PODIUM AND STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS AND THEN WHAT YOUR COMMENT IS.MY NAME IS MOHAMMAD AND I'M HERE WITH MY WIFE, NASIA.
I BOUGHT A LOT COUPLE OF YEARS AGO IN SPRING HILL ESTATES.
TODAY I CAME TO KNOW THAT IT IS UNDER MORATORIUM.
I COULD NOT BUILD A HOUSE ON IT.
THIS PARTICULAR NEIGHBORHOOD IS 25 YEARS OLD.
I THINK I'M THE ONLY LOT LEFT WHO WAS SUPPOSED TO BUILD THE HOUSE HERE.
IT TOOK US A FEW YEARS TO GATHER OUR FINANCES AND EVERYTHING, AND FINALLY WE WERE READY TO BUILD.
BUT WE GOT THE NEWS THAT THERE'S A MORATORIUM.
THE ONLY REQUEST I HAVE IS COULD THERE BE ANY EXCEPTION? BECAUSE THIS NEIGHBORHOOD IS 25 YEARS OLD AND I'M THE ONLY ONE BEING AFFECTED.
ALL THE BIG BUILDERS ACROSS THE STREETS ON THE SPRING HILL, THEY ALREADY KNEW THAT THIS MORATORIUM IS COMING AND THERE ARE NEW DEVELOPMENTS.
BUT OURS IS, THIS ONE IS 25 YEARS OLD.
[00:05:01]
I BELIEVE THAT I'M PAYING THE COST FOR THOSE FANCY BIG DEVELOPERS JUST HAVING ONE LOT LEFT.PROBABLY ONE LOT. I'M NOT SURE.
MAYBE I'M WRONG. ONE OR TWO LOTS LEFT IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD WHICH DOES NOT HAVE A HOUSE ON IT.
ALL OF THEM ARE DEVELOPED, PLANTED 25 YEARS OLD.
I DON'T KNOW HOW IT COULD BE, THERE COULD BE ANY AN EXCEPTION.
THIS IS MY FIRST EVER LIFETIME MEETING IN A CITY COUNTY.
I'VE NEVER BEEN THERE. I'M AN IMMIGRANT.
I CAME OVER FROM ANOTHER COUNTRY, SO THIS IS MY FIRST TIME, SO I DON'T KNOW THE PROTOCOLS, THE OFFICIAL WAY OF DOING IT, BUT THAT'S THE WAY WHAT I FEEL AND I WANTED TO EXPRESS MYSELF.
I DON'T KNOW IF I DO IT CORRECTLY OR NOT.
>> DURING PUBLIC COMMENTS, YOU CAN TALK TO US, BUT WE REALLY CANNOT RESPOND TO YOU AT THIS TIME.
I WILL ASK THAT MR. MACHADO GIVE HIM YOUR CARD IF YOU WOULD.
>> WE ALREADY HAD A CONVERSATION.
THAT WAS THE REASON I JUST WANTED TO BRING IT UP TO YOU GUYS THAT I'M THE ONLY ONE SUFFERING BECAUSE OF THIS.
BECAUSE EVERYBODY ELSE HOUSES ARE BUILT AND ACROSS THE STREET, THEY ARE BIG, FANCY BUILDERS, SO THEY ARE PROBABLY THE ONES WHO ARE COMING IN.
OUR NEIGHBORHOOD IS HERE FOR 25 YEARS.
>> THANK YOU, MA'AM. I REALLY APPRECIATE YOUR TIME.
>> THANK YOU, SIR, FOR COMING.
ARE THERE ANY OTHER PUBLIC COMMENTS AT THIS TIME? THEN WE WILL MOVE ON TO ITEMS OF
[ITEMS OF COMMUNITY INTEREST]
INTEREST AND THERE WILL BE NO EASTER EGG HUNT.I'M SORRY THAT DIDN'T COME TOGETHER.
PASTOR KELLY AT THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH AND HER GROUP, WE'RE GOING TO PUT IT ON WITH PARKS AND RECS AND IT WASN'T ABLE TO COME TO FRUITION.
THERE IS A TENTATIVE TOWN HALL MEETING SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 3RD AT 6:30.
I ASK THAT YOU CHECK THE POSTINGS TO VERIFY THAT IT WILL GO FORWARD.
THE LAST DAY TO REGISTER TO VOTE FOR THE MAY 4TH ELECTION IS THURSDAY, APRIL 4TH.
IF YOU HAVEN'T REGISTERED TO VOTE IN PARKER, PLEASE DO SO.
THERE WILL BE A SOLAR ECLIPSE WATCH PARTY RIGHT ACROSS THE DRIVEWAY HERE IN THE GRASSY AREA ACROSS THE STREET ON MONDAY, APRIL 8TH, AT 1:00 P.M.
THERE WILL BE SOMEONE AT THAT WATCH PARTY THAT WE'LL TALK ABOUT, THE ECLIPSE AND WHAT'S GOING ON AS IT GOES ON.
THEY WILL HAVE A FEW EXTRA GLASSES IF SOMEONE SHOWS UP WITHOUT WATCH GLASSES.
BUT EVERYBODY'S WELCOME TO COME AND ENJOY.
THERE WILL BE A CANDIDATES NIGHT FOR THOSE WHO ARE RUNNING FOR ELECTION TO CITY COUNCIL ON THURSDAY, APRIL 11TH, AT 7:00 P.M AT VICTORY CHURCH.
THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 16TH AT 7:00 P.M IS CANCELED AND RESCHEDULED FOR TUESDAY, APRIL 23RD, AT 6:00 P.M.
THE GREAT AMERICAN CLEAN UP IS SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 20TH AT 9:00 A.M.
THE NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION DRUG TAKE BACK IS SCHEDULED FOR SATURDAY, APRIL 27TH, FROM 10:00 A.M TO 2:00 P.M. NEXT, WE HAVE
[CONSENT AGENDA]
THE CONSENT AGENDA.THE CONSENT AGENDA HAS TWO ITEMS ON IT.
THE FIRST ONE IS THE APPROVAL OF THE MEETING MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 20TH, 2024 REGULAR MEETING.
I BELIEVE EVERYBODY HAS GOTTEN SOME AMENDMENTS TO THAT, AND THEN THE SECOND THING ON THE CONSENT AGENDA IS ANY CONSIDERATION IN OUR APPROPRIATE ACTION ON THE RESOLUTION NUMBER 2024-783, AUTHORIZING CONTINUED PARTICIPATION WITH THE CITY STEERING COMMITTEE AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT OF FIVE CENTS PER CAPITA TO THE ATMOS CITY STEERING COMMITTEE TO FUND REGULATORY AND RELATED ACTIVITIES RELATED TO THE ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION.
[00:10:10]
>> MADAM MAYOR, I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE THE AGENDA, THE MEETING MINUTES FROM THE PREVIOUS MEETING TO THE REGULAR AGENDA.
>> AS TO THE ATMOS STEERING COMMITTEE, WHICH REMAINS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA, IS THERE A MOTION?
>> MADAM MAYOR, I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA, ITEM NUMBER 3 AS PRESENTED.
>> MADAM MAYOR, I SECOND THE MOTION.
>> OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER LYNCH AND A SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER NOE TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEM 3 AS PRESENTED, IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE, I'LL CALL FOR YOUR VOTE.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES 5-0.
NEXT, WE WILL MOVE THE MINUTES DOWN TO THE REGULAR AGENDA AND PROCEED ON THOSE. MS. NOE.
[2. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 20, 2024.[REGULAR MEETING]]
>> MADAM MAYOR, ON THE MINUTES CORRECTION PROVIDED TO COUNCIL ON THE VERY LAST PAGE, THE WORD DOVE SHOULD BE REPLACED WITH THE WORD ALLEN.
>> THERE IS NO NUMBER ON THAT.
NO. WHERE ARE YOU ON THE LAST CORRECTION?
>> IT'S THE THIRD LINE DOWN, DOVE.
>> ON THE PREVIOUS PAGE, AT THE VERY BOTTOM, IT SHOULD SAY SPRING HILL ESTATES, NOT CREEKSIDE ESTATES.
THOSE ARE THE ONLY CORRECTIONS.
>> YEAH. THIS IS THE TRANSCRIPT FROM SKAGIT.
THIS IS NOT THE MINUTES FROM PATTY.
>> THIS HANDOUT IS LABELED 20240220 CITY COUNCIL MINUTE CORRECTIONS.
>> WHAT I DID WAS ATTACHED THE TRANSCRIPT SO YOU CAN SEE THE CHANGES THAT I MADE IN THE YELLOW AND RED.
I CAN'T CHANGE ENTIRE TRANSCRIPT.
I CAN ONLY ATTACH THE MINUTES.
>> ON PAGE 6, IS THERE ANY CORRECTIONS ON THAT?
>> I HAVE NO CORRECTIONS, MADAM MAYOR.
>> IS EVERYBODY CLEAR? ARE THERE ANY OTHER CORRECTIONS OR ADDENDUMS DISCUSSION ON THE MINUTES? NOT HEARING ANY.
>> MADAM MAYOR, I MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE THE MINUTES FOR THE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 20TH, 2024 WITH THE ADDENDUMS THAT WE HAD TALKED ABOUT INCLUDING THE TWO CORRECTIONS ON THE LAST TWO PAGES.
>> WE HAVE A MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM, REED AND A SECOND BY TO COUNCIL MEMBER TODD FECHT.
ANY ADDITIONAL DISCUSSIONS? HEARING NONE, I'LL CALL FOR YOUR VOTE.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
ANY OPPOSED? PASSES 5-0, AND I WILL NOTE THAT THAT'S THE MINUTES PASSED WITH THE ADDENDUMS AS PRESENTED HERE TONIGHT.
[4. TEMPORARY MORATORIUM EXTENSION: PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING EXTENSION OF THE TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ON THE ACCEPTANCE, REVIEW, AND APPROVALS NECESSARY FOR THE SUBDIVISION, SITE PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT, OR CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS AND EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF PARKER. CONSIDERATION AND/OR ANY APPROPRIATE ACTION ON ORDINANCE NO. 866 EXTENDING THE TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ENACTED BY ORDINANCE NO.’S 854, 846, 844, 839, 833, 824, 815 & 812 ON THE ACCEPTANCE, REVIEW, AND APPROVALS NECESSARY FOR THE SUBDIVISION, SITE PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT, OR CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS AND EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF PARKER.]
NOW WE'RE TO ITEM 4, TEMPORARY MORATORIUM EXTENSION.THE FIRST THING IS A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE EXTENSION OF THE TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ON THE ACCEPTANCE REVIEW AND APPROVALS NECESSARY FOR THE SUBDIVISION, SITE PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT AND OR CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS, AND EXTRA TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF PARKER.
[00:15:05]
I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 7:22.>> THIRTY TWO. I'M GOING TO HAVE TO GET BIGGER SPOTS, AND I WILL OPEN IT WITH MR. BIRKHOFF, OUR CITY ENGINEER.
>> GOOD EVENING. I'M JOHN BIRKHOFF WITH BIRKHOFF, HENDRICKS & CARTER OF DALLAS, TEXAS.
I'M BRINGING AN UPDATE ON THE MORATORIUM.
WE'VE HAD THE EXTENSION ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS.
LAST TIME I SPOKE, WE COMPLETED AN HOURLY REVIEW OF THE DEMANDS BACK IN AUGUST AND IT CAME BACK AND SAID THAT ON THE MAX DAY THAT THE PER CAPITA USAGE WAS 721 GALLONS PER CAPITA PER DAY, AND WHEN WE WORK THROUGH ALL THAT, IN LOOKING AT THE VOLUME OF WATER FROM THE DISTRICT, WE WERE JUST OVER FOUR MILLION GALLONS A DAY.
CONTRACTUALLY, YOU'RE AT 3.5 MILLION GALLONS A DAY WITH THE DISTRICT.
WHEN WE TALKED, WE WERE ABLE TO GET THAT SUPPLY.
THE DISTRICT GAVE YOU THE SUPPLY IN YOUR PUMP STATION, THE EAST SIDE PUMP STATION WAS ABLE TO PUMP THAT OUT.
THAT PUMP STATION HAS FOUR PUMPS IN IT, TWO SMALL ONES AND TWO BIG ONES AND BY DESIGN STANDARDS AND TCU STANDARDS, YOU RUN ONE LARGE PUMP, TWO SMALL PUMPS, AND YOU HAVE ONE LARGE PUMP IN RESERVE.
BUT TO MEET THE DEMANDS DURING AUGUST AND BY THE JULY, YOU HAD TO RUN ALL OF THE PUMPS.
WE SAID AS WE CONTINUE THE MORATORIUM UNTIL WE CAN GET A CONTRACT WITH THE DISTRICT, THAT WE SHOULD GO AND ANALYZE THE EAST SIDE PUMP STATION AND DETERMINE IS THERE ANYTHING THAT IS IMMEDIATE ACTION AND IS THERE ANYTHING THAT WE CAN DO AS WE GO INTO THIS COMING SUMMER TO IMPROVE THE RELIABILITY OF THAT STATION? WE PRODUCED A REPORT AND PROVIDED TO THE CITY, AND THERE WAS A NUMBER OF THINGS THAT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT WE WOULD DO, AND WE REALLY NEED TO KEEP THOSE TWO BIG PUMPS AVAILABLE TO US.
IF ONE GOES DOWN, YOU'LL BE SUCKING AIR.
WE RECOMMENDED, AS WE TALKED WITH THE PUMP PEOPLE, THE THING THAT CAN REALLY GO BAD QUICK IS THE MOTOR, 125 HORSEPOWER MOTOR, AND IT TAKES 8-10 WEEKS TO GET ONE.
THEY SUGGESTED THAT YOU BUY ONE NOW AND HAVE IT AVAILABLE SO IF IT GOES DOWN WITHIN A DAY, IF NOT SOONER, YOU CAN REPLACE THAT MOTOR AND HAVE THE PUMP PUMPING WATER AGAIN.
THERE ARE SOME OTHER ITEMS IN THE TWO LARGE PUMPS, JUST MAINTENANCE ITEMS OF ACTUALLY PULLING THE PUMPS AND REPLACING THE SEALS IN THE SHAFT, AND AS MR. MACHADO SAID, YOU ALL HAVE AGREED TO MOVE FORWARD ON A NUMBER OF THOSE ITEMS AND WE NEED TO GO BACK AND TALK TO THE PUMP SUPPLIER AND SAY, OKAY, IF YOU PULL ONE PUMP, CAN WE HAVE IT BACK? BECAUSE WE'RE NOW PUSHING, SPRINGTIME DEMANDS ARE GOING TO START BUILDING AND WE WANT TO BE READY FOR JUNE, JULY, AND AUGUST, IT'S REALLY HOT.
THAT'S WHERE WE ARE FROM OUR LAST MEETING.
WE RECOMMEND THAT YOU EXTEND THE MORATORIUM AGAIN UNTIL YOU GET A CONTRACT WITH NORTH TEXAS.
I'LL OPEN IT UP FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
>> ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. BIRKHOFF?
>> MR. BIRKHOFF, YOU JUST SUMMARIZED THAT YOUR RECOMMENDATION WAS TO PURCHASE A SPARE PUMP MOTOR, IF YOU WILL.
MR. MACHADO, HAVE WE DONE THAT OR IS THAT STILL AN AGENDA ITEM THAT WE WOULD NEED TO PUT TO COUNCIL?
>> WE AGREED TO DO THOSE THINGS.
>> SO THERE WERE NINE ITEMS ON OUR LIST FOR A TOTAL OF ESTIMATED COST FROM THE PUMP SUPPLIER AND ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR AROUND $76,000, IF YOU WANTED TO DO ALL OF THOSE THINGS.
THE PULL PUMPS 2 AND 4, THOSE ARE YOUR LARGE PUMPS.
IT WAS TO REPLACE THE BEARINGS, THE WEAR RINGS, THE SHAFT, THE STUFF AND BOX PACKING, AND TAKE THE PUMP OUT, DO ALL THAT, RESET IT, AND THAT WAS A COST OF $30,000.
AN EASY ONE WAS GO CHANGE ALL THE OIL AND ALL YOUR MOTORS, THE SPRING JUST LIKE YOU DO YOUR CAR, PUT OIL IN IT AND MAKE SURE,
[00:20:02]
WHEN WE LOOKED AT IT, THEY HAD OIL.HOW OLD IS IT? JUST THAT WAS A SIMPLE ITEM THAT'S ABOUT A $1,000 FOR THEM TO COME OUT AND DO THE OIL CHANGE.
THE PURCHASE 125 HORSEPOWER MOTOR AND STORE IT AS 15,000.
YOU HAVE A COST TO REMOVE AND INSTALL THAT OF 2000, SO THAT'S DOWN THE ROAD.
IF A MOTOR GOES OUT, YOU HAVE IT, AND THEN WHETHER GARY'S FOLKS COULD DO IT, OR WE HIRE THE PUMP FOLKS OR THE LOCAL CONTRACTOR COME OUT AND GET THAT DONE.
PRONTO, QUICK. THERE WOULD BE A COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THAT.
WE HAD TO DO A CURRENT EJECTION TEST, THAT WAS 8,000.
I'M NOT SURE THAT TODAY WHERE WE ARE TIME WISE THAT IF YOU DID IT AND SOMETHING WAS BAD THAT YOU'D GET ANOTHER BREAKER IN TIME FOR THE SUMMER.
SO THAT MAY BE ONE THAT YOU MAY PUT OFF WHERE YOU ARE ON YOUR BREAKER.
WE HAD TO REPLACE SOME FLEX TIGHT CONDUIT.
THAT'S JUST A REALLY A MAINTENANCE ITEM THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE, IS PULLED LOOSE.
I THINK I HAD SOME PICTURES THAT YOU SAW THAT, THAT WAS 2,500.
I THINK I SKIPPED ONE WAS A MOTOR STARTER FOR THE LARGE PUMP.
THOSE MOTOR STARTERS HAVE A LIFE OF ABOUT 10-15 YEARS.
YOU'RE ON YEAR 13, THEY CAN GO OUT TOMORROW OR THEY MAY LAST ANOTHER 10, 15 YEARS.
>> NUMBER 6, YEAH; AND THAT WAS $2,500.
SO IF IT GOES OUT AGAIN, WE'RE ABLE TO PUT IT IN AND GET THAT PUMP IN AND RUNNING.
ANOTHER ITEM THAT WE HAD BELOW THAT, THOSE MAINTENANCE ITEMS WAS A HIGHER COST OF 175,000, WHERE YOU WOULD GO IN AND YOU WOULD BUILD A BLOCK WALL INSIDE YOUR PUMP STATION AND YOU WOULD CONDITION THAT SPACE WHERE THE ELECTRONICS ARE.
YOUR NEW PUMP STATION, THE ELECTRICAL ROOM IS AIR-CONDITIONED, HEATED, SO WE CAN EXTEND THE LIFE OF THE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT.
WHEN THAT PUMP STATION WAS CONSTRUCTED, THE MINDSET WAS PROBABLY STILL ON ON OLD MOTOR CONTROL CENTERS.
THEY WERE PRETTY HEFTY ACROSS THE LINE.
STARTER IS NOT VERY EFFICIENT.
YOU PUT THEM OUTSIDE AND THEY JUST PERFORM.
AS TIME HAS GONE ON, WE'VE GONE TO SOFT STARTS TO SATISFY THE ENCORE, SOME POWER CORRECTION EQUIPMENT AND MAKE IT MORE EFFICIENT.
BUT EVEN THE HYDRAULICS OF HAVING, GETTING RID OF PUMP CONTROL VALVES AND HAVING JUST CHECK VALVES, THAT EQUIPMENT IS ELECTRONICS, COMPUTERS SITTING IN THERE, CONDITIONED SPACE.
THEY'LL HOPEFULLY LAST LONGER AND THAT'S THE WAY YOU WOULD DESIGN A NEW PUMP STATION, AND THAT'S SOMETHING THAT YOU MAY LOOK AT NOW OR DOWN THE ROAD THAT YOU PROVIDE THAT AT THE EAST SIDE PUMP STATION.
>> WOULD YOU LIKE ME TO ADDRESS THESE TO YOU? >. YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO DIRECT IT TO ME, YES.
>> FIRST OFF, ON THE LETTER [INAUDIBLE] DESIGN FOR PUMP STATION, IT'S CONFORM TO THE TCEQ REQUIREMENTS.
HAS THE LARGEST PUMP OUT AT ANY GIVEN TIME AS IT'S A BACKUP PUMP IN THE EVENT THAT THERE'S PUMP FAILURES.
IS THAT A REQUIREMENT, A RECOMMENDATION OR WHAT? IF WE'RE RUNNING ALL THE PUMPS, ARE WE IN NONCONFORMANCE WITH TCEQ? OR COULDN'T TELL FROM THIS LETTER HERE.
>> MR. BIRKHOFF, WOULD YOU REFER.
>> RIGHT, YOU'D BE IN NONCONFORMANCE WITH THE TCEQ REQUIREMENTS OF A PUMP STATION.
>> IS THERE SOME TYPE OF PENALTY TO THAT OR HEY, YOU'RE JUST IN NONCONFORMANCE PERIOD.
>> SO YOU HAVE A BUNCH OF TCEQ RULES FOR OPERATING YOUR WATER SYSTEM.
THEY COME OUT ON AN ANNUAL BASIS, SEMI-ANNUAL, AND THEY INSPECT IT.
IF THAT IS KNOWN, YOU'LL GET WRITTEN UP FOR IT, THEN YOU HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TIME TO REMEDY THAT.
IF YOU DON'T GET IT REMEDIED, THEN THEY SEND YOU A FINE TO CONVINCE YOU TO COME UP WITH SOME MONEY TO FIX THE DEFICIENCY, AND THAT FINE GETS BIGGER AND BIGGER UNTIL YOU FIX IT.
SO AT THIS POINT, I WOULD GUESS YOUR INSPECTOR CAME OUT, THEY INSPECTED EVERYTHING.
[00:25:05]
GAVE YOU A LIST AND THAT WAS NOT ON THE LIST THIS YEAR.I DON'T THINK WE VOLUNTEERED THAT INFORMATION. NO.
>> MS. LYNCH, DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? WHAT ABOUT YOU, JIM?
>> MR. FACT? MS. NOE, DO YOU HAVE A FOLLOW UP?
>> EXCUSE ME, COUNCILMEMBER NOE, DO YOU HAVE A FOLLOW UP QUESTION?
>> OKAY. COUNCILMEMBER KERCHO, DO YOU HAVE A COUNT?
>> I DO. SO I DO APPRECIATE THE FACT THAT YOU PUT IN HERE, YOU RAN EACH PUMP OR A SERIES OF PUMPS.
HOW MUCH IT PUMPED OUT, HOW MANY MILLIONS OF GALLONS PER DAY THAT WE ACHIEVED.
OBVIOUSLY, OTHER THAN THE FACT THAT IN THE SUMMER TIME, PEOPLE GET THIRSTIER AND DRINK MORE, I ASSUME THE BIG DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WINTER AND SUMMER IS IRRIGATION.
SO FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF JUST CURIOUS AS TO WHAT WE RUN MILLIONS OF GALLONS PER DAY IN THE WINTER.
SO SOMETHING DID IN FACT HAPPEN, AND WE SAID, OKAY, "HEY, FOR WHATEVER REASON, THE PUMP STATION HAS GOT TO ISSUE AND WE'RE NOT ALLOWING ANY TYPE OF IRRIGATION FOR THIS MOMENT.
WHAT THAT ACTUALLY BRINGS IT DOWN TO."
>> SO IN JANUARY, WHAT PUMP DO YOU RUN?
>> JANUARY, WE CAN GET BY WITH ONE SMALL PUMP.
THE VOLUME DIFFERENCE IS DRAMATIC NOT FROM SUMMER OR WINTER.
>> EXCELLENT. SO IF YOU'RE RUNNING ONE SMALL PUMP, THAT'S ABOUT 1.7 MILLION GALLONS A DAY.
IN THE SUMMER, YOU'RE RUNNING AROUND FOUR MILLION GALLONS A DAY, AND THAT'S ALL GOING ON IRRIGATION.
FILLING SWIMMING POOLS, THINGS THAT YOU DO IN THE SUMMERTIME YOU DON'T DO IN THE WINTER.
THEN ON THE ACTUAL 125 HORSEPOWER PUMP, MY QUESTION THERE WAS, AT THE PUMP STATION WE CURRENTLY ARE NOT USING ON DILLEHAY, IS THERE 125 HORSEPOWER PUMP AT THAT PUMP STATION THAT IF IT WENT WRONG, WE WOULD JUST PULL IT FROM THAT PUMP STATION TO THE ONE THAT ACTUALLY IS OPERATING?
>> NO, THERE'S NOT 125 HORSE PUMP IN THAT PUMP STATION.
I BELIEVE WE HAVE 40 AND 25 HORSEPOWER PUMPS DOWN THERE.
>> IF I CAN ANSWER JUST A FOLLOW UP QUESTION. I'M JUST CURIOUS.
I KNOW THAT THE IT'S NOT A TOWER AND MAYBE DOESN'T HAVE TO GO AS FAR.
IS THERE A REASON WHY SO MUCH DIFFERENCE IN THE ACTUAL CAPACITY ARE NEEDED FOR THE PUMPS? BECAUSE THAT'S ONLY 60 HORSE POWER OR 65 VERSUS HALF? I'M JUST CURIOUS. I DON'T KNOW.
>> IT'S BASICALLY A BOOSTER STATION.
IT'S NOT DESIGNED TO RUN THE ENTIRE CITY OFF THAT STATION.
>> MR. BIRKHOFF, DO YOU HAVE ANY LAST COMMENTS?
>> AT THE EAST SIDE PUMP STATION, THE DISTANCE THAT IS OUT THERE, THOSE PUMPS HAVE TO PUMP AT A HIGHER HEAD TO GO THROUGH THAT 18-INCH LINE TO GET TO THIS TOWER.
AS YOU GET A NEW SUPPLY LINE CONNECTION WITH NORTH TEXAS AT THE CENTRAL PUMP STATION, THE HEAD OF THOSE PUMPS ARE LESS TO FILL THE TANK.
>> MR. OLSON, DO YOU HAVE A COMMENT?
>> WE GOT PRV'S ALONG THE WAY THERE, PRESSURE RELEASE VALVES, TO HELP ALLEVIATE SOME OF THOSE PRESSURES THAT THAT LINE PUTS IN.
I KNOW THAT'S RUNNING DOWN PARKER ROADS.
>> THANK YOU, SIR. NOT AT THIS TIME.
IS THERE ANYONE ELSE IN THE AUDIENCE THAT HAS ANY COMMENTS ON THE ON THE WATER MORATORIUM? THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING, WE WELCOME, YOUR COMMENTS.
I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC CLEARING. I CAN'T READ THAT.
COUNCIL, IS THERE ANY COMMENTS YOU WISH TO MAKE UNDER THIS SECTION AND NOT THE NEXT SECTION, WHICH IS CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION ON ORDINANCE NUMBER 866? NOT HEARING ANYTHING, THEN WE WILL MOVE ON TO [OVERLAPPING].
>> MAYOR, I HAVE A POINT OF ORDER TO QUESTION WHETHER THIS MORATORIUM COULD
[00:30:03]
BE ALSO CONSIDERING THE NINE ITEMS THAT MR. BIRKHOFF JUST COVERED.>> I DON'T UNDERSTAND YOUR QUESTION, I'M SORRY.
>> I GUESS I HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT THE ORDER.
IN TERMS OF THIS AGENDA ITEM, IS IT POSSIBLE TO HAVE AN AMENDMENT WHERE WE ADD REQUESTS FOR A QUOTE TO GO OUT AND TRY TO PROCURE THE ITEMS THAT MR. BIRKHOFF JUST SUMMARIZED.
>> THAT COULD BE A FUTURE AGENDA ITEM.
>> THE [INAUDIBLE] ARE IN SUPPORT OF THE MORATORIUM EXTENSION, AND HE'S IDENTIFIED THOSE, BUT THEY WOULD NATURALLY NEED TO COME BEFORE COUNCIL FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION.
>> AS A SEPARATE AGENDA ITEM. THANKS FOR CLARIFYING.
>> THEN WE WILL ADDRESS THE SECOND PART OF THE MORATORIUM CONSIDERATION AND OR ANY APPROPRIATE ACTION ON ORDINANCE NUMBER 866, EXTENDING THE TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ENACTED BY ORDINANCE NUMBERS 854, 846, 844, 839, 833, 824, 815, AND 812 ON THE ACCEPTANCE, REVIEW, AND APPROVALS NECESSARY FOR THE SUBDIVISION SITE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT AND OR CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS AND THE EXTRA TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF PARKER.
>> MADAM MAYOR, I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE NUMBER 866, EXTENDING THE TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ENACTED BY ORDINANCES NUMBERS 854, 846, 844, 839, 833, 824, 815, AND 812 ON THE ACCEPTANCE, REVIEW AND APPROVALS NECESSARY FOR THE SUBDIVISION SITE PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT, OR CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS, AND EXTRA TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF PARKER.
>> MAYOR, I WOULD SECOND THAT.
>> WE HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER NOLE [PHONETIC] AND A SECOND BY MAYOR PROTEM REED.
IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE, THEN I WILL CALL FOR YOUR VOTE.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF APPROVING ORDINANCE NUMBER 866, PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES 5-0.
NEXT, WE'LL GO TO ITEM NUMBER 5,
[5. CONSIDERATION AND ANY APPROPRIATION ACTION ON RESOLUTION NO. 2024- 784 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A MASTER INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF FORNEY AND THE CITY OF PARKER.]
CONSIDERATION AND ANY APPROPRIATE ACTION ON RESOLUTION NUMBER 2020-4784, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A MASTER INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF FORNEY AND THE CITY OF PARKER.MR. OLSON, YOU WANT TO EXPLAIN THAT?
WHAT WE'VE DONE IS A PREQUEL TO NUMBER 6, WHEN WE STARTED LOOKING AT THE TIPS PRICING, WHICH WE APPROVED THE LAST TIME, THE ILA FOR TIPS, WE COME TO FIND OUT THAT THERE WERE SOME ADDITIONAL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THAT.
WE REACHED OUT TO A COUPLE OF OTHER SURROUNDING CITIES.
FORNEY HAD HAD INTERLOCALS WITH THE CITY OF LUCAS, WITH ANDERSON PAVING ALSO.
WHAT WE'VE DONE IS WE'VE CONTACTED CITY OF FORNEY.
I BELIEVE THEY'RE GOING ON TONIGHT ON THIS SO WE CAN PIGGYBACK OFF THEIR BID PRICING FOR THAT SO IT BRINGS THE COST DOWN AND IT SATISFIES THE GOVERNMENT BIDDING REQUIREMENTS.
>> IF YOU COULD, JUST FOR ALL THE CONSTITUENTS, EXPLAIN WHAT WE'RE TALKING, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT ROAD REPAIR AND SO FORTH.
>> YES, THIS WOULD BE FOR ROAD REPAIR. SORRY.
>> OF COURSE. GO AHEAD, COUNCIL MEMBER KIRTRA [PHONETIC].
>> MY QUESTION IS NOT PARTICULARLY TO THIS, BUT IN THE SAME VEIN IS THAT I KNOW YOU SAID, LUKE, THAT WE WENT OUT BASICALLY TO OTHER CITIES TO ASK ABOUT IT.
WHEN WE HAVE SOMETHING COMING UP FOR BID, DO OTHER CITIES SEND SOMETHING OUT AND SAY, THIS IS WHAT WE'RE DOING SO THAT THESE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS BASICALLY CAN TAKE MORE MEAT TO IT?
THERE'S REALLY NOTHING OUT THERE.
BASICALLY, WE KIND OF JUST DO A CURSORY SEARCH ON THE INTERNET AND ON THEIR WEBSITES TO SEE IF THEY HAVE ANY OUT THERE.
SOME CITIES, I KNOW DALLAS COUNTY, CITY OF DALLAS, I BELIEVE RICHARDSON, ARLINGTON,
[00:35:03]
FORT WORTH, THEY HAVE A PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT, AND THEY HAVE THOSE POSTED ONLINE WHAT THEIR PROCUREMENTS ARE AND WHAT THOSE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THEM SO WE CAN GET THOSE BID DOCUMENTS, BUT THEN REACH OUT TO THEM AND GET ILA TO SUPPORT THAT.>> JUST AS A COMMENT ON THAT., I WOULD THINK THAT MOST OF THE SERVICES ARE PROBABLY FROM LATE SPRING INTO THE EARLY SUMMER AND MID SUMMER.
IS THERE A FREQUENCY WHERE MAYBE IT MAKES MORE SENSE TO PULL THEM ON A BASIS OR MAYBE HAVE A CONTACT? CAN WE PUT THAT AS AN ACTION ITEM OF THIS?
>> I WILL SAY WITH THIS ONE, I THINK IT RAN FOR FIVE OR SIX YEARS, THE BID REQUIREMENT WAS, SO IT JUST GOT THE STANDARD CIP, I BELIEVE INCREASES IN THERE.
THIS ONE WILL LAST US, I THINK FOR ANOTHER YEAR OR TWO, IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY. I THINK THROUGH 2025.
WE'LL BE FINE WITH THAT ONCE WE HAVE THIS ON CONTRACT, BUT WE'LL ALWAYS KEEP OUR EYES OPEN FOR IF THERE'S ANY ADDITIONAL COST SAVINGS OUT THERE.
THE NICE THING IS THE BIGGER THE PROJECT YOU GET, THE INCREMENT COSTS COME DOWN.
SO THAT DOES HELP OUT WHEN WE GET A BIGGER PROJECT.
>> THIS IS A FOLLOW UP QUESTION. JUST AS THEY LOOKED AT THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT THAT FORNEY HAD WITH THE ASPHALT GROUP, THE NUMBER THAT THEY PUT OUT THERE AS FAR AS SAYING THIS IS WHAT THEY'RE GOING TO SPEND LIKELY PER YEAR WASN'T A LARGE AMOUNT, BUT THEY GOT ANDERSON ASPHALT AND PAVING THAT COME IN AND BASICALLY CREATE SOMETHING OF THIS NATURE WHICH I ASSUME IS GOOD.
SO MY QUESTION IS DO WE AS A CITY, CURRENTLY HAVE ANY OF THESE TYPE OF AGREEMENTS IN PLACE OR SEEK THESE TYPE OF AGREEMENTS?
>> CURRENTLY, WE DON'T HAVE ANYTHING THAT WE'VE BID OUT THAT I WOULD BELIEVE WOULD MEET THE REQUIREMENT LIKE WHAT OTHER CITIES WOULD BE USING.
I CAN'T THINK OF ANYTHING AT THIS POINT UNLESS IT'S ENGINEERING SERVICES, WHICH WE GOT THE ART OF CUES ON, BUT I DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT THE LEGAL BACKGROUND.
YEAH, IT'D HAVE TO BE LIKE A ACTUAL SERVICE CONTRACT.
>> BUT WE'VE SPENT QUITE A BIT ON ROADS AND OTHER STUFF BEFORE SO MY QUESTION IS, AS WE GO OUT FOR ROADS, DO WE TRY TO CREATE SOME TYPE OF DOCUMENT THAT FORNEY HAS WITH THIS GROUP THAT SAYS, "HEY, I'M LOOKING FOR BIDS OR I'M GOING TO HAVE A MULTI YEAR AGREEMENT IN PLACE WITH PRICING, ETC, BASED UPON WHAT COMES UP OVER THE NEXT X NUMBER OF YEARS."
FROM MY UNDERSTAND WE'VE ALWAYS PIGGYBACKED ON OTHER CITIES OR COUNTIES FOR THAT AND BEFORE WE DID WITH ELLIS COUNTY AND DALLAS COUNTY, WITH TEXAS BID, THAT CONTRACT RAN UP AT THE END OF LAST YEAR, I BELIEVE.
NOW, WHEN WE WERE OUT LOOKING AND WE TALKED TO ANDERSON AND THE OTHER CITIES, THIS WAS THE MOST REASONABLE ONE THAT WE COULD FIND OUT THERE AT THAT TIME.
THE CITY OF LUCAS IS ALSO USING THEM SO THEY'RE FAMILIAR WITH THE AREA AND THOSE ITEMS RELATED TO THAT.
>> ANY OTHER COUNCIL MEMBER HAVE QUESTIONS? NOT HEARING ANY, THEN I WOULD CALL FOR A MOTION.
>> MADAM MAYOR, I MOVED TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 2024-784, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A MASTER INTER LOCAL COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF FORNEY AND THE CITY OF PARKER.
>> WE HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER KERCHO KERCHO TO APPROVE OR EXCUSE ME, RESOLUTION NUMBER 2024-784 WITH A SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER TODD FE.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? NOT HEARING ANY.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF APPROVING RESOLUTION NUMBER 2024-784 PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES 5, 0.
NOW WE WILL GO TO ITEM NUMBER SIX.
[6. DISCUSSION, CONSIDERATION AND/OR ANY APPROPRIATE ACTION ON RESOLUTION NO. 2024-779 AUTHORIZING AWARD OF CONTRACT AND EXECUTION OF NECESSARY AND RELATED DOCUMENTS WITH ANDERSON ASPHALT & CONCRETE PAVING, LLC TO PERFORM STREET MAINTENANCE WORK CONSISTENT WITH ITS COMPETITIVELY PROCURED CITY OF FORNEY PROPOSAL PRICING AVAILABLE TO THE CITY OF PARKER UNDER THE MASTER INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF FORNEY AND THE CITY OF PARKER [POSTPONED 2024 0206]]
DISCUSSION, CONSIDERATION AND OR APPROPRIATE ACTION ON RESOLUTION NUMBER 2024-779, AUTHORIZING AWARD OF CONTRACT AND EXECUTION OF NECESSARY AND RELATED DOCUMENTS WITH ANDERSON ASPHALT AND CONCRETE PAVING LLC TO PERFORM STREET MAINTENANCE WORK CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPETITIVELY PROCURED CITY OF FORNEY INTER LOCAL COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT[00:40:04]
BETWEEN THE CITY OF FORNEY AND THE CITY OF PARKER.AT THIS TIME ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS? GO AHEAD, COUNCIL MEMBER LYNCH.
>> I WAS EXPECTING MR. OLSON TO EXPLAIN A LITTLE BIT OF WHAT THIS WAS GOING TO BE DONE FIRST.
IF THAT THAT MIGHT BE HELPFUL, IT MIGHT ANSWER THE QUESTION.
>> MR. OLSON, WOULD YOU PLEASE DESCRIBE THAT?
>> YES, MA'AM MAYOR. WHAT WE'RE GOING TO DO HERE, IT IS THE BID FOR THE ROAD REPAIRS THAT WE'VE ASKED TO DO.
IT WOULD CONSIST OF AREAS ON DUBLIN ROAD, LEWIS LANE, AND CURTIS ROAD, AND THEN A COUPLE OF CONCRETE PANELS WITHIN MOSS RIDGE, CORRECT IN THOSE AREAS.
NOW, THE BIG QUESTION THAT I NEED TO KNOW FROM COUNSEL IS WHETHER THEY WANT TO DO OPTION ONE OR OPTION TWO FOR THE S CURVE ON THE SOUTH SIDE.
WITH FLAGGERS IT'S BECAUSE I THINK THAT THE ROAD BID JUST INCLUDES OPTION TWO.
THAT'S 8,000 SO IT WOULD BE ANOTHER, SORRY, MY MASK WAY OFF TODAY,13.
ABOUT 13,000 IF WE DID NOT CLOSE THE S CURVES DOWN DURING THAT TIME FRAME.
MY UNDERSTANDING THREE DAYS BUT WE WOULD BE ABLE TO DRIVE ON THAT AT NIGHT, CORRECT.
>> SO THOSE WERE TWO OPTIONS WE HAD.
WE THOUGHT WE NEEDED TO PRESENT THOSE TO COUNSEL.
IF WE DO THE FLAGGERS, IT'S GOING TO TAKE, I THINK, FOUR DAYS.
>> YES. THOSE WERE THEIR TWO OPTIONS AND WE WOULD HAVE TO PUT UP SIGNAGE AND EVERYTHING ELSE OF ROAD CLOSURE, SOMETHING DOWN THAT LINE.
>> DO YOU HAVE A RECOMMENDATION?
>> I'D PREFER TO GET THEM IN AND OUT, BUT THAT WOULD BE A COUNCIL DECISION ON THAT.
>> COMMENTS, QUESTIONS? COUNCIL MEMBER KERCHO.
>> I'D BE PREPARED TO BE EMBARRASSED BUT THE OTHER DAY I THOUGHT I ADDED ALL THESE UP THAT WE HAVE ON PAGE WHATEVER IT IS, 154 AND THE BID NUMBER TO BE INCLUDED ALL THE NUMBERS THERE.
IT ADDED UP TO WHAT WE'RE SHOWING AS BID.
>> LET ME READ PRICES BASED ON THE ROAD CLOSURE.
>> I SAW THAT WRITTEN THERE BUT I DOUBLED ME.
>> LET ME BREAK A CALCULATOR OUT. I WON'T EMBARRASS MYSELF.
YOU ARE CORRECT. IT WAS ALL OF THE NUMBERS SO WE TAKE OFF THE 13,000.
IF YOU DO THE ROAD CLOSURE WILL BE $13,000 LESS.
>> RELATED AGAIN, BUT NOT EXACTLY IS THAT I KNOW WHEN ALLEN WAS DOING A BUNCH OF THEIR ROAD WORK, THEY HAD PURCHASED OR HAD OR WHATEVER A MACHINE SET UP AT BOTH ENDS OF THE ROAD WORK THAT BASICALLY HAD NO FLAGGERS THERE.
AND IT BASICALLY I DON'T KNOW IF IT MEASURED THE AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC THAT WAS STILL THERE OR IS TIMED OR WHAT, BUT IT BASICALLY WOULD DIRECT THE TRAFFIC BACK AND FORTH.
AND MY QUESTION THERE IS THAT WE HAVE A LOT OF ROADWORK COMING UP AND WHAT IS THE COST OF
[00:45:07]
THOSE PARTICULAR MACHINES AND WOULD IT BE WORTHWHILE TO EITHER RENT OR BUY THAT TYPE OF MACHINE AS WE GO INTO ALL THIS DIFFERENT ROADWORK, AGAIN COMING UP IN THE NEAR FUTURE?>> WELL, THAT WOULD BE BASED ON THOSE PROJECTS.
THIS PROJECT IS JUST THE S CURVES.
THE ONLY REASON THAT IT WOULD NEED WITH FLAGGERS IS BECAUSE OF THE VISION DISTANCES AND THE SPEEDS THAT ARE TRAVELED ON THAT ROAD.
THAT WOULD BE WHY WE WOULD DO THE FLAGGERS.
IF NOT, WE WOULD JUST CLOSE IT DOWN AT THIS POINT.
THE TRAFFIC CONTROL LIGHTS, THE TEMPORARY ONES THAT I THINK YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT FROM WHAT I'VE SEEN, TYPICALLY YOU RENT THOSE OUT.
THOSE ARE VERY EXPENSIVE, BUT THEN YOU'LL HAVE TO GET SOME ON THE SIDE STREETS AND EVERYTHING ELSE IF YOU DO IT THAT WAY.
YOU'LL HAVE ADDITIONAL COSTS WITH THOSE, WON'T JUST BE TOO BECAUSE THERE'S GOING TO BE SOME SIDE STREET TRAFFIC THAT WE'LL HAVE TO SHUT DOWN DURING SOME OF THAT TIME FRAME OR THEY'LL JUST ALLOW WHAT'S CALLED JUST LOCAL TRAFFIC THROUGH THERE.
>> YEAH, THE HOMEOWNERS THROUGH THERE.
>> WELL, WE SAW IT WAS ON SPRING HILL, THE STATE'S ROAD, WHICH IS OBVIOUSLY HIGHER TRAFFIC VOLUME AND FASTER TRAFFIC THAN DUBLIN.
TO ME IT LOOKED LIKE IT COULD WORK BUT YOU'RE SAYING IT WOULDN'T.
>> I THINK YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE A HIGHER COST THAN THE 21-5 IF WE RENTED THAT MACHINE SO THAT'S WHY WE DIDN'T.
TYPICALLY, THOSE ARE GOING TO BE COSTLY RENTALS.
>> YES. THE SURFACE IS AN ASPHALT SURFACE THAT WE'RE PUTTING DOWN.
WITH RESPECT TO LEWIS LANE, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THOSE PORTIONS OF LEWIS LANE THAT WE ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE.
>> THAT WE'RE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE ON, IS THAT CORRECT?
>> CORRECT, YEAH. WE WOULD BE ONLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SECTIONS THAT WE ARE BECAUSE THERE ARE SOME COUNTY AREAS THERE IN THE CITY OF LUCAS AND THERE'S BEEN SOME DISCREPANCIES AT THIS POINT OF WHO OWNS WHAT OVER THERE.
>> WITHIN THAT, WELL, ONE, IT'S MULTI PRONGED QUESTION.
ONE, WHAT ADDITIONAL LIFESPAN ARE WE GAINING GIVING OURSELVES TO PUT THIS SURFACE ON? THEN THE SECOND PIECE IS, AND I KNOW THE OTHER PARTS AREN'T PARKERS, BUT YOUR RESIDENT DRIVE OR OUR RESIDENTS DRIVE ON THAT STREET ALL THE TIME AND ANYBODY LOOKS AT THE COUNTY PIECE OF THAT ROAD AFTER A RAIN AS IT IS RIGHT NOW IS REALLY BAD.
WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO TO MAKE THAT MORE PASSABLE SO THAT DOING OUR PARTS NOT GOING TO DO ANY GOOD IF THE OTHER PARTS AREN'T WORKING?
>> I'LL ANSWER PART OF THAT AND THEN EITHER MR. MACHADO OR MR. OLSON.
WE ARE TRYING TO WORK WITH THE OTHER ENTITIES TO COME UP WITH A JURISDICTIONAL PLAN POLICY WHERE THINGS GET DONE AT ONE TIME RATHER THAN THIS PIECEMEAL THAT REALLY DOESN'T WORK LONG TERM VERY WELL.
I KNOW WE'VE WORKED ON THAT, WE'VE LOOKED AT IT, WE'RE JUST NOT HAVING A GREAT DEAL OF LUCK AT TIMES.
YEAH, NOT THERE YET. MR. MACHADO?
>> I'VE BEEN TRYING TO GET THE COUNTY AND LUCAS ALL AT THE SAME TIME, ALL THREE OF US TRYING TO SORT THAT OUT.
WE AGREE WITH THE COUNTY ON WHERE THE WORSHIP LIES OF MAINTENANCE, LUCAS DISAGREES, WE'RE TRYING TO SORT THAT OUT.
>> THEN WITH RESPECT TO TIME, AGE, HOW MUCH ARE WE GAINING? HOW MUCH TIME ARE WE GIVING OURSELVES TO TO PUT THIS DOWN?
>> THE [INAUDIBLE], THE PATCHES WE PUT DOWN WILL OUTLAST THE REST OF THE ROAD.
>> WE'LL PUT IT DOWN REAL HEAVY.
>> IDEALLY WITH THAT ROADWAY, WE WOULD WANT TO HAVE IT ENGINEERED AND DO LIKE WE DID WITH THE CURVES THERE WITH THE FABRIC AND WITH THE LIFTS AND EVERYTHING IN IT.
>> IF WE CAN'T SORT OUT OF OUR OWNERSHIP AND SPLIT IT UP, THEY CAN KILL EQUITABLY OR WHATEVER, THEY'LL NEED TO GET WITH THE OTHER ENTITIES AND EVERYBODY JUST CAN DO IT.
>> CORRECT. THAT'S BEEN, I THINK, ONGOING CONVERSATIONS FOR FIVE YEARS NOW WITH
[00:50:02]
THOSE ENTITIES AND EVERYONE ALWAYS THROWS SOMETHING UP AT ONE TIME OR ANOTHER.IT'S JUST GETTING THREE PEOPLE TO AGREE ON OWNERSHIP AND WHAT STATE LAWS WERE AT THE TIME AND EVERYTHING LIKE THAT.
>> WHAT'S THE PROGRESS? MAKE A COMMENT.
>> I WOULD THINK THAT THE OVERALL, IF YOU GET PEOPLE IN A ROOM, THAT THEY WOULD PROBABLY AGREE, ESPECIALLY OF ENGINEERING PEOPLE THERE THAT YOU WANT TO DO IT IN THE SAME MANNER.
>> THEN YOU HAVE CHANGING PARTIES AND THAT THIS GUY MAY BE ENGINEER TODAY AND HE MAY NOT BE THERE TOMORROW, WHICH HAS HAPPENED WITH ONE OF THE CITIES, SO WORK IN PROGRESS.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS?
>> YEAH. MADAM MAYOR, WITH THAT SAME THOUGHT IN MIND, DO WE HAVE A BREAKDOWN OF HOW MANY LINEAR FEET IN EACH STREET ARE TARGETED TOWARDS THIS PROPOSAL?
>> WE DON'T HAVE THE NUMBERS CONFIRMED.
>> WE WENT OUT THERE, WE MARKED THEM OUT.
>> YEAH, WE MARKED IT OUT IN ORANGE PAINT OUT THERE AND THEN MEASURED EVERYTHING AND THEN ANDERSON MET GARY AND HIS STAFF OUT THERE AND WE WENT THROUGH ALL THOSE LINEAR FEET.
THAT'S WHERE WE CAME UP WITH THE SQUARE YARDS BECAUSE WE HAD THEM CHANGE THE MATH ON THAT BECAUSE IT WAS SQUARE FEET AT ONE POINT.
IT'S SQUARE YARDS TO MATCH UP WITH THE BID.
BUT THAT SHOULD MATCH UP WITH EVERYTHING.
I BELIEVE THIS IS NOT TO EXCEED, CORRECT, GARY?
>> FOR THOSE AREAS THAT WE'VE IDENTIFIED.
>> JUST OUT OF CURIOSITY, IF IT COMES IN LESS EXPENSIVE THAN WE HAD ESTIMATED, ARE THERE OTHER PLACES THAT WE CAN THEN MOVE ON TO?
>> YEAH, WE'VE GOT A COUPLE AREAS THAT WE'VE ALSO IDENTIFIED THAT COULD BE NEXT IN LINE.
>> OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, COMMENTS?
>> THE ONLY LAST ONE I'LL ASK WAS ON THE CONCRETE PANELS THAT YOU'RE DOING IN COUNCIL MEMBERS MOSS EFFECTS.
YEAH. IN MOSS RIDGE, IS THERE GOING TO BE ANYTHING THAT HAS TO BE DONE FOR THE ACTUAL UNDERLAYMENT THERE FOR THE DRAINAGE AND WHATNOT OVER THERE PROBLEMS?
>> THOSE DRAINAGE PROBLEMS ARE NEVER PROBABLY GOING TO BE SOLVED AT THIS POINT, UNFORTUNATELY.
THE PANELS OVER THERE, I THINK THERE WERE SOME AREAS WHERE THERE WAS ONLY TWO INCH CONCRETE AND REBAR SITTING RIGHT ON TOP OF THE THE PANELS.
AND THAT'S WHERE SOME OF THOSE AREAS, WHEN TRUCK TRAFFIC WENT THROUGH THERE, IT'S CRACKED OFF THAT TOP PORTION AND YOU'LL SEE REBAR IN THOSE AREAS.
THEY'LL HAVE TO DIG DOWN A LITTLE BIT AND THEN DOW THOSE CUTOUTS BACK INTO TO MAKE IT COHESIVE WITH ONE PANEL.
>> AND THE ONES THAT HAVE HEAVED, THERE'S SOME THAT HAVE ACTUALLY FALLEN AND I ASSUME THEY WOULD BE REPLACED.
SO THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO BUILD THAT UP BEFORE THEY PUT BACK IN THE CONCRETE BAY.
>> COUNCIL MEMBER FACT YOU'RE BEING AWFUL QUIET AGAIN.
>> GARY AND I WENT OVER THIS IN GREAT DETAIL AND LOOK TO SPEED AND WHAT THEY'RE GOING TO DO OVER THERE.
>> ONCE IT'S DECIDED WHAT TYPE OF TRAFFIC CONTROL, I DON'T KNOW IF IT WAS IF I MISSED IT, BUT I'M OBVIOUSLY GOING TO HAVE TO UPDATE THE RESOLUTION, THE TOTAL UP TO TOTAL CONSIDERING BOTH ARE IN THE BID.
>> HEARING NO OTHER QUESTIONS OR DISCUSSION, THEN I WILL CALL FOR A MOTION.
>> MADAM MAYOR, I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE RESOLUTION NUMBER 2024-779, AUTHORIZING THE AWARD OF CONTRACT AND EXECUTION OF NECESSARY AND RELATED DOCUMENTS WITH ANDERSON ASPHALT & CONCRETE PAVING, LLC, TO PERFORM STREET MAINTENANCE WORK CONSISTENT WITH ITS COMPETITIVELY PROCURED CITY OF FORNEY PROPOSAL PRICING AVAILABLE TO THE CITY OF PARKER UNDER THE MASTER IN LOCAL AGREEMENT OR IN A LOCAL COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF FORNEY AND THE CITY OF PARKER AS ADJUSTED TO ELIMINATE OPTION 1 COST OF $21,500.
>> IS THAT OKAY WITH YOU, COUNSEL?
>> WE HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER LYNCH AND A SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER FECHT TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 2024-779.
[00:55:06]
IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? NOT HEARING ANY.ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF APPROVING RESOLUTION NUMBER 2024-779, PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
THE RESIDENTS.THIS IS A GREAT START.
[7. CONSIDERATION AND/OR ANY APPROPRIATE ACTION ON RESOLUTION NO. 2024-785 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A STANDARD AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING RELATED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WITH THE CITY’S ENGINEER, BIRKHOFF, HENDRICKS & CARTER, LLP, RELATED TO THE WATER LINE RELOCATION AND IMPROVEMENTS ON DUBLIN ROAD, AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF ANY NECESSARY AND RELATED DOCUMENTS.]
CONSIDERATION AND OR ANY APPROPRIATE ACTION ON RESOLUTION NUMBER 2024785, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A STANDARD AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING-RELATED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WITH THE CITY'S ENGINEER, BIRKHOFF, HENDRICKS & CARTER LLP, RELATED TO THE WATER LINE RELOCATION AND IMPROVEMENTS ON DUBLIN ROAD, AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF ANY NECESSARY AND RELATED DOCUMENTS.COUNSEL, ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS?
>> YES, MADAM MAYOR, I WOULD LIKE TO SEEK FURTHER CLARIFICATION IN TERMS OF THE BREAKDOWN OF $175,000 QUOTE FOR THE DESIGN.
>> MR. BIRKHOFF, WELCOME BACK.
>> THANK YOU. SO THE 175,600 IS THE DESIGN PHASE OF THE PROJECT AND SO WE HAVE A SCOPE OF SERVICES OF WHAT THAT CONSISTS OF.
SO WE WILL GO OUT AND WE WILL WORK WITH GARY IN IDENTIFYING THE LINE WHERE WE THINK IT IS TODAY, DO SOME THOUGHTS OF AN ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENT OF WHERE WE CAN GET THAT LOCATED, EVALUATE THOSE ALTERNATIVES AND TRY TO ZERO WIN ON ONE.
MOST OF THAT WILL BE DONE JUST FROM AERIAL MAPPING AND PLAT AND ABSTRACTS.
SO WE'LL HAVE A LITTLE PROPERTY WORK DONE TO FIGURE OUT, ARE WE IN RIGHT AWAY OR ARE WE IN PRIVATE PROPERTY? HOW MANY EASEMENTS DO WE NEED? WHAT CAN WE FIGURE OUT TO MINIMIZE, HAVE THEM GO GET MORE EASEMENTS ON THERE.
ONCE WE GET THAT PRETTY MUCH IN LINE, WE'LL SEND OUR SURVEY CREW OUT AND SAY, OKAY, THIS IS WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO FOCUS ON.
AGAIN, IF WE'RE GOING TO BE HAVING TO HAVE EASEMENTS, WHAT EFFECTS DO WE HAVE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY? FENCE LINES, TREES, DITCHES, DRIVEWAYS, TRYING TO FIGURE ALL THAT OUT.
WE'LL GET IN AND WE WILL ESTABLISH THE HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT, AND THAT WILL BE BASED ON COORDINATES THROUGH THERE, SO A CONTRACTOR CAN COME IN AND LAY IT OUT AND PUT IT WHERE IT'S SUPPOSED TO BE.
WE'LL DO A VERTICAL ALIGNMENT SO YOU'LL KNOW HOW DEEP IT IS.
AS WE START TO LOOK AT THE HIGHS AND LOWS, WE'LL TRY TO PUT FIRE HYDRANTS AT THE HIGH POINT SO YOU CAN BLEED THE AIR OUT OF THE LINES OVER TIME AS YOU EXERCISE YOUR FIRE HYDRANTS.
WELL, WE'LL WORK WITH DIG TEST.
WE'LL LOCATE THE DIFFERENT UTILITIES.
AND AS WE GET IN CONFLICTS WITH THOSE, WHAT DO WE DO WITH THEM? CAN WE GET THEM TO RELOCATE IF THEY'RE WITHIN YOUR RIGHT AWAY? IF WE'RE IN EASEMENTS, THAT BECOMES MORE DIFFICULT TO WORK OUT.
AND THEN WHAT CHANGES THAT WE WOULD HAVE TO MAKE IN THE HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL ALIGNMENTS TO FACILITATE OUR LINE WITH THE FRANCHISE UTILITIES.
AS WE LOOK AT THE ROADWAY IN THERE, WE HAVE WHAT TYPE OF ROADWAY PATCH THAT WE'RE GOING TO PUT IN THERE.
YOU ALL ARE DOING SOME OTHER WORK IN THAT AREA AND WE'LL NEED TO COORDINATE WHATEVER YOU ALL HAVE BESIDE TO DO WITH ANDERSON PAVING TO MAKE SURE THAT THE TWO JIVE TOGETHER.
THERE WILL BE SOME LOCATIONS WHERE WE'LL HAVE TO HAVE DIG UPS OF UTILITIES WHERE THERE'S SOME OF THE CONNECTIONS THAT YOU HAVE AND WE'LL BE LOOKING FOR THE CITY TO DIG THOSE THINGS UP SO WE CAN SEND THE CREW BACK OUT AND FIGURE OUT WHAT ADJUSTMENTS WE NEED TO MAKE.
THERE'S A CONNECTIONS THAT WILL BE MADE TO EXISTING LINES.
WE'LL FIGURE OUT WHERE THE SERVICES ARE AND MAKE THOSE CONNECTIONS.
[01:00:05]
THROUGH THE PROCESS, WE'LL HAVE TO DO EROSION CONTROL THAT'S REQUIRED BY THE STATE IN YOUR STORMWATER MANUAL.WE CONTROL THE SILT AND DEPENDING ON WHERE WE PUT THE LINES AND WHERE WE'RE CUTTING, WE'LL FIGURE THAT OUT.
WHEN WE SEE THAT WE'LL HAVE STANDARD DETAILS THAT WE'LL USE, BUT THERE WILL PROBABLY BE SOME SPECIAL DETAILS FOR THE YOUR CONNECTIONS OF WHAT FITTINGS ARE GOING TO TAKE TO MAKE IT WORK.
WE'LL GO THROUGH AND FIGURE OUT HOW WE MAKE THOSE CROSS CONNECTIONS.
WE'LL SUBMIT PLANS TO THE CITY AT 60%, GET INPUT FROM THEM TRYING TO SOLVE CONFLICTS BEFORE THE CONTRACTOR FINDS THEM.
I CAN'T SIT HERE AND SAY WE'RE GOING TO SOLVE ALL OF THE CONFLICTS, YOUR CONTRACTORS WILL DIG SOMETHING UP THAT NOBODY KNEW WAS THERE OR IT'S NOT WHERE WE THOUGHT IT WAS, AND WE'LL RESOLVE THOSE DURING CONSTRUCTION.
BUT WE WANT TO TRY TO MINIMIZE THOSE BECAUSE WHEN THE CONTRACTOR FINDS THEM, THEN IT COSTS YOU SOME MONEY IN THE CHANGE ORDER, WE WANT TO TRY TO MINIMIZE THOSE THINGS.
WE'LL PREPARE COST ESTIMATES BASED ON THE QUANTITIES THAT WE'VE COME UP WITH IN THE PLAN SET.
WE'LL GO TO CURRENT PROJECTS, BE IT TABS THAT ARE OUT THERE AND GET WHAT CURRENT COSTS ARE FOR THE 8" WATER LINE, THE VALVES, THE FIRE HYDRANTS, WHAT DEPTH ARE WE AT FOR EMBEDMENT.
A GOOD PART OF THAT WILL BE BASED ON THE NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, BUT WE'LL PUT THE BID BOOK TOGETHER AND HAVE IT READY TO GO OUT FOR BIDS.
THAT'S THE 40,000 FOOT VIEW OF WHAT WE HAVE TO DO, AND A LOT OF IT, ONCE WE GET THE SURVEY IN WE'LL FIGURE OUT HOW IT WORKS.
>> I THINK COUNCIL MEMBER RAY. EXCUSE ME.
>> JUST SOMETHING I CAUGHT MY EYE IS THAT YOU HAVE THIS ADDITIONAL SERVICES THAT'S LIKE 60 GRAND I SEE ON THERE, AND THEN ONE THING THAT I THOUGHT WAS ODD WAS THAT THE $0.50 A MILE FOR AUTOMOBILE MILEAGE, FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES.
WHAT'S WEIRD IS THE NATIONAL RATE, 65.
IT'S ODD THAT IT'S 50 TO BEGIN WITH.
>> IT'S ACTUALLY $0.67 DOWN TO 2024.
>> SIXTY SEVEN, YEAH. BUT AT ANY RATE, THE POINT BEING IS THAT IF YOU DO A BALLPARK AND LET'S ROLL IT ALL TOGETHER AND CALL $200 CREW RATE AN HOUR.
I'M JUST SWAGGING TO DO QUICK NUMBERS SINCE I'M SLOW SO THAT WOULD BE 300 HOURS OF ADDITIONAL SERVICE TO GET TO 60 GRAND.
I JUST WANTED TO UNDERSTAND HOW THAT LITTLE PARAGRAPH CAME TO 60 GRAND.
BECAUSE 300 HOURS IS A LOT OF TIME IN MY OPINION.
BECAUSE 300 HOURS TIMES 200, SO I'M SWAGGING.
THE MILEAGE ADDITIONAL CAN'T BE THAT BIG BECAUSE THAT HAS TO BE PEOPLE WHO ARE PROFESSIONALS THAT ARE RUNNING BACK AND FORTH.
THAT'S NOT THAT MUCH. THEN I'M SAYING THAT THERE'S THIS SWAG FACTOR OF 2.4, 1.15 TIMES, BUT JUST WANTED TO UNDERSTAND.
>> ADDITIONAL SERVICES. WELL, I CAN GO BACK.
YOU HAVE BASIC SERVICES, WHICH IS REALLY THE DESIGN, THE BIDDING, AND CONSTRUCTION.
THAT'S JUST THE PRACTICE MANUALS ARE WRITTEN OF DEFINING WHAT BASIC SERVICES ARE AND THEN THERE'S A LIST OF ADDITIONAL SERVICES.
IN THAT LIST OF ADDITIONAL SERVICES CAN BE PRETTY LONG.
HERE YOU HAVE 1, 2, 3, 4 ITEMS. YOU HAVE DESIGN SURVEYS, YOU HAVE A SURVEY CREW, YOU HAVE A RATE AT THAT SURVEY CREW OF $185 PER HOUR AND WE CHARGE $0.50 OUGHT TO BE 67 BUT $0.50 FOR THEM TO TRAVEL UP HERE.
THEY'RE EQUIPPED WITH GPS, THEY'RE EQUIPPED WITH TOTAL STATIONS.
THE EQUIPMENT VALUE IN THAT TRUCK IS SITTING AROUND $70,000 WORKED INTO THAT HOURLY RATE, THE RENTAL OF THE TRUCK AND ALL THOSE PIECES.
WE CAN GET ALL THAT BREAKDOWN IF YOU WANTED THAT MUCH.
BUT THEY'LL COME OUT IT'S AN HOURLY BASIS.
IF THEY CAN DO IT IN A DAY, YOU GET CHARGED 8 HOURS.
IT TAKES A WEEK, IT'S 40 HOURS.
AGAIN, WHEN YOU GET INTO DUBLIN ROAD SURVEYING,
[01:05:01]
DEALING WITH THE TRAFFIC, GETTING THE TREES, GETTING THE DITCH OR THE TOPO, AND GETTING THE ELEVATIONS, GPS REALLY WORKS WELL WHEN YOU'RE NOT HAVING A LOT OF TREES.IN THIS CASE, WE'RE GOING TO BE NOW SURVEYING IN THE SPRING.
THE TREES ARE GOING TO BE LEAKED OUT.
THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO CONVERT BACK TO A TOTAL STATION, WHICH TAKES MORE TIME THAN A GPS SO ESTIMATED TIME THAT IT TAKES.
THERE'S GOING TO BE SOME EASEMENT SURVEYS ONCE WE FIGURE OUT WHAT EASEMENTS WE NEED THE CREW IS GOING TO HAVE TO COME BACK OUT.
THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO LOCATE IRON PINS.
IF WE CAN FIND THOSE VERY QUICKLY, IT DOESN'T COST AS MUCH.
IF THEIR PINS HAVE BEEN DISTURBED AND THEY'RE NOT THERE, THEN WE HAVE TO GO TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES.
BECAUSE AS WE DO EASEMENTS, THE LAW REQUIRES YOU TO TIE IT TO KNOWN POINTS.
WE HAVE TO FIND THE IRON PIN SOMEWHERE AND THEN WE HAVE TO HAVE REFERENCE TO THAT.
THAT'S JUST PART OF THE PROCESS OF MEETING THE LAW.
PREPARATION OF FIELD NOTE DESCRIPTIONS AND PLATS.
THAT'S THE TIME TO DO THE DEED RESEARCH, THE TIME TO DO THE FIELD NOTE DESCRIPTION, THE MEETS AND BOUNDS PORTION OF IT.
YOU HAVE TO DO THE WRITTEN PART, AND THEN YOU HAVE TO GO IN AND DO THE EXHIBIT AND THEN WE WOULD GET THAT TO THE CITY.
THE CITY ATTORNEY WOULD THEN DO THE FORMAL PROCESS AND THEN THE CITY WOULD GO OUT AND ACQUIRE THOSE EASEMENTS.
>> ONE JUST COMMENT, GARY, ON THOSE EASEMENTS, NOT EASEMENT, BUT PREPARATION FOR ALL OF THESE LAYOUTS AND THE PLANS AND SO FORTH.
THIS WOULD BE MORE DETAILED PLAN INFORMATION THAN WHAT WE HAVE NOW BECAUSE OF WHAT YOU'RE DOING TO REARRANGE EVERYTHING SO IT WOULD PROVIDE US BENEFIT THAT WE WOULD HAVE IS THAT CORRECT?
>> YEAH. A LOT OF THAT AREA IS PRESCRIPTIVE SO DOWN DUBLIN ROAD IS PRESCRIPTIVE EASEMENT.
WE WOULD HAVE TO BE IDENTIFYING ALL THOSE AREAS SO WE DO.
WE WOULD HAVE A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF THOSE AREAS. CORRECT, JOHN?
>> RIGHT. WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO GET THE DEEDS AND PUT THE DEEDS TOGETHER, MAKE OUR MAP, FIGURE OUT WHERE OUR WATER LINES ARE AND THEN IF WE'RE IN PRESCRIPTIVE RIGHT AWAY, WE'RE GOING TO COME BACK TO THE CITY ATTORNEY AND SAY, WHAT'S YOUR DEFINITION OF PRESCRIPTIVE RIGHT AWAY? DIFFERENT ATTORNEYS HAVE A DIFFERENT ED.
>> WE DON'T WANT GO INTO TODAY.
>> IT CAN BE DIFFERENT THINGS AND DO WE FIT IN THAT CATEGORY? THERE ARE SOME AREAS THAT'S GOING TO BE TRULY EASEMENTS FROM THAT WATER LINE IS OUTSIDE THE PRESCRIPTIVE RIGHT AWAY TODAY AND HOW DO WE HANDLE THAT.
>> I HAVE A CLARIFYING QUESTION ALSO REGARDING THE SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATIONS SECTION ON PAGE 366.
THERE AT THE BEGINNING OF THIS DOCUMENT, IT SUGGESTS THAT SURVEYS, TEST INVESTIGATIONS, SHALL BE FURNISHED BY THE CITY.
BUT YET, IN THIS DOCUMENT, YOU HAVE QUOTED PRICES FOR VARIOUS DIFFERENT SURVEYS.
COULD YOU PLEASE DIFFERENTIATE ITEM D IF THERE ARE ADDITIONAL SURVEYS THAT NEED TO BE FURNISHED BY THE CITY AND TESTS AND INVESTIGATIONS.
>> THESE WOULD BE POTHOLING THE LINE, SOME WAY TO GO OUT AND DIG THEM UP, WHETHER IT'S THE CITY TO GO OUT AND DIG THEIR LINES UP OR YOU HIRE AN OUTSIDE PARTY TO DO THAT.
THE NEW CONTRACT THAT THE CITY HAS, IT SAYS THAT THOSE TYPE OF SERVICES THE CITY WILL HANDLE SO WE BROKE THOSE OUT AND WE PUT THOSE AS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CITY AND NOT IN OUR CONTRACT.
>> DOES THE CITY HAVE AN ESTIMATE OF THE COST FOR THE BORING SAMPLES AND THE ADDITIONAL TESTS CITED HERE ON PAGE 366?
>> THAT WOULD BE HANDLED BY CITY STAFF.
WE WOULD SEND OUT OUR EVAC TRUCK AND WE'D GO OUT THERE, POT A HOLE.
THEN WE WOULD IDENTIFY WHERE THOSE LINES ARE AT AND MARK THEM FOR WHEN SURVEYORS COME OUT, SO THEY WOULD KNOW EXACTLY WHERE THOSE LINES ARE AT.
WE'LL USE CITY STAFF TIME FOR THAT.
>> I HAVE QUESTIONS REALLY MORE RELATED TO THE CITY THAN MR. BIRKHOFF, WITH RESPECT TO THE OVERALL PROPOSAL.
I GUESS I WAS A LITTLE BIT SURPRISED.
I FEEL LIKE THIS IS GOING VERY FASTER THAN WE ANTICIPATED.
I, IN MY MIND, THOUGHT WE WERE LOOKING FOR HOW MUCH ENGINEERING COST WOULD BE AND HOW MUCH THE PROBABLE COST OF THIS PROJECT WOULD BE AND THEN FIGURE HOW WE'RE GOING TO TACKLE THE PROJECT.
IF WE WERE TO TAKE THIS WHOLE PROJECT AND DO IT NOW, THAT'S A TOTAL OF $2.4 MILLION + 250,000, THAT WOULD BE COMPLETED BY CONSTRUCTION PHASE THROUGH
[01:10:04]
APRIL OF 25 WHICH IS AN EARLIER DATE, I THINK, THAN AGAIN, AT LEAST WAS IN MY MIND.I'M CONCERNED ABOUT HOW WE WOULD FUND SOMETHING LIKE THIS IF WE WERE TO APPROVE IT.
I'M NOT SURE WE'RE READY TO APPROVE THIS.
I THINK IT'S GOT SOME GOOD INFORMATION IN IT FOR SURE, BUT THAT'S A CONCERN.
THE OTHER THING IS, AS WE'RE LOOKING AT THIS, I WANT TO POINT OUT OR REQUEST THAT WORK THAT A COUPLE OF RESIDENTS HAVE DONE WITH RESPECT TO THE DEEDS IN PLATS ON DUBLIN ROAD, NORTH AND SOUTH, HAVE BEEN DONE, AND THAT BE SHARED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THIS PROJECT SO THAT THE WORK DOESN'T HAVE TO BE REDONE BECAUSE THERE WAS A PRETTY THOROUGH COPIES OF DEEDS FOR DUBLIN ROAD A YEAR AND A HALF AGO.
>> BECAUSE I'VE NEVER SEEN HIM, THAT'S WHY I WAS ASKING.
>> YES. MR. MACHADO HAS HAS THE BOOK AND A ZIP DRIVE FOR USE WHEN APPROPRIATE, AND I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE IT HAS THE OPPORTUNITY TO BE USED, IF APPROPRIATE.
>> WHAT I WAS GOING TO DO IS ADDRESS THE COST, WHAT WE LAID OUT HERE.
ULTIMATELY, THE INITIAL PHASES, WE DO HAVE THE FEDERAL FUNDS.
THAT'S WHAT WOULD BE USED TO PAY FOR THIS.
YOU CAN USE THOSE FUNDS FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES.
THE IDEA BEHIND WHAT MYSELF AND CITY STAFF WERE THINKING WAS WITH DESIGN THE WHOLE THING UPFRONT, AND THEN COUNSEL CAN DECIDE FROM THAT POINT ON WHICH PHASES THEY WANT TO MOVE FORWARD WITH.
I KNOW PHASE 1, BETSY, THE SOUTH CITY LIMITS.
IT'S A PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST OF JUST OVER $1 MILLION.
>> THAT IS THE BIGGEST PROBLEM AREA.
I THINK THAT'S THE AREA THAT WE'VE IDENTIFIED AMONGST THE CIP AND EVERYONE HAVING THAT CONVERSATION.
BETSY SOUTH, TO THE SOUTH CITY LIMITS.
>> HERE'S A REPORT THAT I RECEIVED FROM OUR POLICE DEPARTMENT.
THIS SHOWS THE ACCIDENTS ON NORTH DUBLIN AND ALL THE PROPERTY DAMAGE.
>> THIS IS JUST FOR THE WATER LINE THOUGH.
THIS IS NOTHING ELSE BUT THE WATER LINE ITSELF.
YES. THIS IS JUST FOR THE WATER LINE, THE DESIGNS OF IT.
WE CAN'T USE THE FEDERAL FUNDS FOR DRAINAGE, ROADS OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT.
THERE WAS STRICT REQUIREMENTS THAT WE HAD FOR THIS, AND WATER LINES AND SEWER LINES WERE WITHIN THOSE GUIDELINES.
GREG, HOW MUCH DO WE HAVE? I FORGET.
>> WE WOULD BE PRETTY CLOSE BASED ON THE ENGINEERING COST.
IF WE HAVE TO DO THE ADDITIONAL SERVICES NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT, THEY COULD COME IN CHEAPER TOO, SO NOT THE 60,000 TOTAL.
ONCE YOU ADD THAT WITH $1 MILLION, WE'RE GETTING CLOSE TO 1.2 MILLION, SO WE WOULD HAVE TO GET WITH JOHN AT THAT POINT AND SEE HOW WE WOULD NARROW THAT SCOPE DOWN, OR HOW WE WOULD HANDLE THAT IF COUNSEL JUST CHOSE OPTION TO DO PHASE 1.
NOW, IF WE CHOSE TO LOOK AT PHASE 2, PHASE 3, THEN WE'D HAVE TO TAKE A HARDER LOOK AT THE NUMBERS.
BUT WE NEED TO GET THE DESIGN AND A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROBABLE COST.
THIS IS AN ESTIMATE BASED ON WHAT JOHNSON KNOWS, A 40,000 FOOT VIEW, NOT A FIVE FOOT VIEW.
>> THE FEDERAL MONEY, YOU HAVE TO SPEND IT BY DECEMBER 2025, IS THAT?
>> NO, WE HAVE TO HAVE IT ALLOCATED.
A BID HAS TO BE EXPORTED BY THE END OF THIS YEAR.
>> I WOULD MIMIC COUNCILWOMAN LYNCH'S THOUGHTS.
ORIGINALLY I THOUGHT, AND MAYBE IT WAS ONLY BECAUSE IT WAS THAT SEAT OF SOUTH LIMIT, BUT THAT'S NOT WHAT I RECALL.
BUT WHEN WE WERE TALKING ABOUT THE FEDERAL FUNDS, SO ROUGHLY 1.3 MILLION I THINK IT WAS, IN MY MIND, WE WERE CLOSE TO ALMOST COVERING IT.
NOW WE'RE PROBABLY CLOSE TO 3 MILLION, BECAUSE BESIDES WHAT COUNCILWOMAN LYNCH SAID, CERTAINLY WE'RE GOING TO RUN INTO THINGS.
WE'RE GOING TO PLOW THROUGH PEOPLE'S DRIVEWAYS.
WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO REPLACE SOME DRIVEWAYS.
WE KNOW WE'RE GOING TO HIT AREAS WHERE THE WATER LINE IS, THAT WE DON'T KNOW BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE GOOD DRAWINGS OF IT.
WE HAVEN'T DONE THE RIGHT AWAY, AND THAT'S ALL GOING TO BE A WHOLE ANOTHER COST FACTOR
[01:15:01]
TO TRY AND GO IN AND VERIFY ALL THAT.BY THE TIME WE'RE DONE, I THINK WE'RE PROBABLY CLOSE TO 3 MILLION AS A GUESS, AND THAT'S A BIG NUMBER.
I WAS PUSHING FOR THE WATER LINES ALONG DUBLIN BECAUSE IT HAD TO BE DONE BEFORE THE ROAD WORK WAS DONE.
WELL, NOW WE JUST APPROVE THE ROAD WORK TO BE DONE ON SOUTH SIDE OF DUBLIN, SO IT WILL LAST A COUPLE OF YEARS.
WE'RE SO CLOSE ON THE CIP PLAN ITSELF, IT WOULD PROBABLY BE GOOD TO JUST PUT THE COST IN THERE OF WHAT IT IS, AND THEN COMPLETE THE CIP PLAN.
GO THROUGH WHATEVER REVIEWS THAT WE WANT TO GO THROUGH, DETERMINE WHERE THE SUPPORT IS FROM THE CITIZENS, ET CETERA, ON WHAT TO DO.
THEREFORE, MY RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE TO NOT DO ANYTHING AT THIS TIME UNTIL WE GET IT INTO THE CIP PLAN AND PUSH THROUGH THAT AND START HAVING SOME COUNSEL INPUT.
>> IS THERE A WAY, MR. OLSON, TO SEPARATE THE ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION FROM THE ACTUAL STRAIGHT WORK, SO WE COULD GO AHEAD AND DEAL WITH THE FEDERAL FUNDS.
>> WE'VE GOT TILL THE END OF THIS YEAR TO BUDGET SOMETHING?
>> WE HAVE TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT WITH THE COMPANY BY THE END OF THE YEAR.
>> THAT'S NOT WHAT OUR AUDIT MANAGER SAID BECAUSE WE ASKED HER THAT LAST MEETING, WE CAN GO BACK TO THE MINUTE, SPECIFICALLY WHAT IS NEEDED, AND SHE SAID PURELY BUDGETED BY THE END OF THIS YEAR.
SHE ALSO SAID THAT IT COULD BE USED FOR ROADS.
I KNOW THAT YOU SAID THAT IT COULDN'T BE, AND NOW YOU'RE SAYING THAT IT HAS TO BE MORE THAN BUDGETING.
I'M JUST SAYING WHAT WE ASKED SPECIFICALLY, THE AUDIT MANAGER.
>> I THINK SHE MISSPOKE BECAUSE WHEN WE WENT BACK AND LOOKED AT THE ACTUAL FEDERAL DOCUMENTS AND THE UPDATES ON THOSE FEDERAL DOCUMENTS WITH THE EXPLANATIONS, IT DOES SAY HAS TO BE AWARDED A CONTRACT BY THE END OF THE 2024.
>> YEAH. HOWEVER, JUST TO REITERATE WHAT COUNCILMAN KERCHO WAS SAYING IS THAT WE DO HAVE SOME TIME THOUGH.
IT'S NOT LIKE WE HAVE TO DO THIS RIGHT NOW.
I REALLY THINK THAT SOME OF THESE OTHER THINGS THAT ARE ROLLING IN WITH IT WOULD BE GOOD TO HAVE AT LEAST AN UNDERSTANDING OF AND SEE HOW IT ROLLS IN HERE, BECAUSE IT SHOULD BE HAPPENING IN THE NEXT MONTH OR A MONTH AND A HALF.
THEN WE COULD, AT THAT POINT, GO FORWARD WITH THIS AND WE HAVE ALL THE INFORMATION TO LOOK THROUGH AND I JUST THINK THAT IT WOULD BE DOING OUR DUE DILIGENCE TO GO THROUGH ALL OF THAT INFORMATION BEFORE WE MAKE ANY DECISION RIGHT NOW ON THIS. WE HAVE TIME.
THE DESIGN PHASE IS GOING TO TAKE US ALMOST TO OCTOBER AT THIS POINT.
IF WE EXECUTE JUST THE DESIGN PHASE OF THIS PROJECT.
>> THE SCHEDULE IS ON PAGE 388.
>> I'M SORRY. EXCUSE ME, COUNCIL MEMBER, NO I DIDN'T HEAR YOU.
>> THE SCHEDULE IS ON PAGE 388.
>> YEAH AND THAT'S IF EVERYTHING GOES TO PLAN.
THAT'S NOT LIKE ACQUIRING RIGHT OF WAY IF WE HAVE TO GO CONDEMNATION ROUTE OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT, THAT ADDS ADDITIONAL TIME ON THAT. ALL OF THAT.
WE WOULD HAVE TO WORK AROUND THOSE TIME FRAME SO WE ARE IN A TIME CRUNCH.
IT DOESN'T SEEM LIKE IT BUT WE ARE.
I THINK WHAT WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE AS FAR AS STAFF GOES, IS AN OVERALL DESIGN PLAN FOR ALL OF THE LINE CONSTRUCTION AND THEN COUNSEL, AT THAT POINT, WE CAN COME BACK TO YOU ALL AND DECIDE ARE WE JUST DOING PHASE 1, PHASE 2, OR PHASE 3.
THAT'S WHERE I THINK WHAT WE WOULD BE OR YOU DO THEM ALL.
THAT WOULD BE OUR RECOMMENDATION SINCE YOU ALREADY HAVE THE FUNDING COMING IN AND YOU'RE LOOKING AT AROUND, WHAT WAS IT, 252 MAC NOT TO EXCEED.
YOU'RE STILL LEAVING YOURSELF ABOUT $1 MILLION WHICH IS CLOSE TO THAT ABOUT $40,000 SHORT.
THAT DOESN'T INCLUDE GOING OUT AND GETTING RIGHT AWAY OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT.
THAT'S JUST THE DESIGN FOR THE WHOLE SYSTEM AS A WHOLE.
>> BUT THE SCHEDULE SAYS COMPLETE FINAL PLANS AND BIDDING DOCUMENTS BY AUGUST 30 AND THEN ADVERTISE PROJECT FOR BIDS BY SEPTEMBER OF 2024.
THAT DOES SOUND LIKE IT GIVES US AT LEAST A MONTH OR TWO IF THIS SCHEDULE HOLDS.
>> BUT WE'LL HAVE TO GET THE ENGINEERING DONE AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE.
BECAUSE IF WE HAVE SOME SNAFU OR SOMETHING THAT HAPPENS ALONG THE WAY
[01:20:02]
HERE THAT COULD ADD IN A MONTH OR SO TO THIS PROJECT OR TWO MONTHS.I JUST DON'T HAVE A CRYSTAL BALL.
IF WE HAVE TO GO OUT AND I DON'T KNOW WHAT WOULD BE SOMETHING THAT WE WOULD RUN INTO OUT THERE, JOHN, BUT JUST OVERALL JUST GETTING A RIGHT OF WAY AND IDENTIFYING HOW WE'RE GOING TO GET THAT RIGHT AWAY AND EVERYTHING ELSE WITH THAT PROJECT.
BUT AGAIN, THIS IS COUNSEL'S DECISION.
IF WE NEED TO COME BACK WITH SOME ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, WE CAN DO THAT.
>> WHAT SAYS COUNSEL? WHAT WOULD YOU LIKE TO DO?
>> I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO POSTPONE THIS ITEM UNTIL THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING.
>> WE HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER NOAH, AND A SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER FAD TO POSTPONE ITEM NUMBER SEVEN.
ANY COMMENTS? IF NOT, I'LL CALL FOR YOUR VOTE.
I'M SORRY. DID YOU HAVE A COMMENT?
>> I'D LIKE TO ACTUALLY AMEND MY MOTION BECAUSE I FEEL LIKE THE DATE OF THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING DOES NOT ALLOW FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF ALL THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND SO I'D LIKE TO AMEND THE DATE FOR THE POSTPONEMENT TO BE THE FIRST COUNCIL MEETING AFTER THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN AGENDA ITEM.
>> YOU ARE AMENDING YOUR SECOND.
WE HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER NOAH TO POSTPONE ITEM NUMBER SEVEN UNTIL AFTER THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN GO TO COUNCIL.
ANY OTHER COMMENTS? IF NOT, I WILL CALL YOUR VOTE.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
MISS NOAH, I DID HAVE A QUESTION FOR YOU.
YOU SAID, PENDING SOME ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, CAN YOU GIVE STAFF AT THIS TIME DIRECTION AS TO WHAT INFORMATION IT IS THAT YOU NEED OR WANT?
>> I THINK THE CONSIDERATION FOR THE FUNDING OF THE PROJECT.
>> YEAH, I WAS JUST GOING TO ASK THAT.
>> BECAUSE ULTIMATELY WE'RE JUST DOING THE DESIGN.
I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE UNDERSTAND THAT ARE YOU WANTING FOR EACH PHASE HOW WE'RE GOING TO DO THAT OR THE WHOLE PROJECT?
>> I DON'T THINK, WE'D HAVE TO DO IT BY PHASE THERE.
ANY OTHER INFORMATION THAT YOU COULD THINK OF OR ANYBODY COULD THINK OF THAT THEY WOULD MISS COURT?
>> I'M JUST CURIOUS ON RIGHT AWAY.
I KNOW COUNCILWOMAN LYNCH AND I DID THAT LISTING WHICH BASICALLY GIVES A LOT OF DOCUMENT NUMBER SO SOMEONE COULD GO INTO THE COURTHOUSE AND VERIFY THAT INFORMATION I BELIEVE PROBABLY PRETTY QUICKLY.
BUT I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE COST OF DOING THAT RESEARCH OR EVEN VERIFYING THAT RESEARCH FOR RIGHT AWAY ACROSS ALL OF DUBLIN WOULD COST.
IF IT'S SMALL, BIG, SOMEWHERE IN BETWEEN.
IF IT'S SOMEWHERE NOT SMALL, THEN I WOULD LIKE AT LEAST SOME GUESS AS TO WHAT THAT WOULD COST AS WELL.
IT WAS NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT FOR THOSE COSTS BUT THE OVERALL BID PACKAGE, SO THAT WAS INCLUDED WITH ALL OF THAT.
THE NOT TO EXCEED 250 OR WHATEVER THAT WAS.
>> CAN ANYBODY THINK OF ANYTHING? BECAUSE I WANT US TO HAVE ALL THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION THAT IS NEEDED THE NEXT TIME THIS COMES UP ON AN AGENDA.
IF YOU THINK OF SOMETHING BETWEEN NOW AND THEN, PLEASE SEND LUKE AN EMAIL AND LET HIM KNOW WHAT IT IS THAT YOU WOULD LIKE AND WE WILL WORK ON IT. WE ARE NOW TO UPDATES
[8. UPDATE(S)]
[01:25:15]
AND THE FIRST UPDATE IS 2551. MR. OLSON.>> YES. THE CONSTRUCTION COMPANIES ARE THERE RIGHT NOW ON PARKER ROAD, THEY ARE INSTALLING THE BOX CULVERTS INTO MAXWELL CREEK AREA.
GARY'S NOT HERE. WE'VE REACHED OUT TO TXDOT TO GET SOME ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON WATER VOLUME FLOWS SINCE IT'S A TXDOT PROJECT.
FROM MY UNDERSTANDING, JUST LOOKING AT THE PLANS WE HAD HERE, THE WATER DOES NOT EXCEED WHAT'S ALREADY GOING INTO THAT CREEK SO IT'S A WHOLE DRAINAGE BASIN THERE THEY LOOKED AT.
THAT IS SOMETHING THAT WE'RE GETTING ADDITIONAL CLARIFICATION ON FOR THAT.
BUT AS FAR AS THAT GOES, THAT'S ALL I KNOW, IT'S TAKING PLACE AT THIS CURRENT MOMENT.
>> WEBSITE. MS. LYNCH, YOU WANT TO UPDATE US ON THE WEBSITE?
>> WITH RESPECT TO THE FRONT END THE WORK THAT ROBIN AND DORY HAVE BEEN WORKING ON.
I THINK THAT'S CONTINUING TO MOVE FORWARD.
LUKE AND I TALKED TODAY ABOUT THE DISTRICT.
THERE ARE SOME ADDITIONAL THINGS THAT THE COMMITTEE I THINK SHOULD TALK ABOUT WITH RESPECT TO THE OVERALL STRUCTURE OF THE UNDERLYING DATABASE.
>> COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, MR. KERCHO.
>> WE'RE CONTINUING TO MAKE GOOD PROGRESS.
I THINK EXCEPTION OF ONE WEEK, WE'VE MET EVERY WEEK AND WE'RE GETTING A MEETING THIS FRIDAY, AND IT'S TAKING GOOD SHAPE. I'M HAPPY WITH THE PROGRESS.
>> SERGEANT DIXON OR MR. OLSON, CAN YOU TALK ABOUT POLICE VEHICLES?
>> THE VEHICLE THAT IS IN BENNEY, IS THAT RIGHT? WE'RE JUST WAITING FOR IT TO GET ON A TRUCK TO HEAD THIS WAY.
THAT'S OUR HOLD UP RIGHT NOW, UNLESS WE WANT TO PAY SOMEONE TO LIE DOWN THERE AND DRIVE IT BACK.
BUT I THINK WE WANTED TO DO THAT.
WE'RE JUST WAITING FOR A TRUCK RIGHT NOW TO BRING THAT VEHICLE UP HERE.
THEN THE FORD EXPEDITION THAT'S IN PENNSYLVANIA, THEY ARE MOVING THAT ONE UP.
THEY'RE TRYING TO GET THAT AS QUICKLY MOVED UP TO THE FRONT AS POSSIBLE.
I THINK CHIEF PRICE SAID WE SHOULD HAVE THAT ONE BY END OF JUNE, IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY.
THEN WE HAVE ANOTHER ONE OUTSTANDING.
I JUST CAN'T REMEMBER WHERE WE'RE AT WITH THAT PROCESS ON THAT ONE, I'M SORRY.
>> THE ONE WE'RE WAITING DELIVERY ON PRETTY QUICKLY IS THE TRUCK.
THAT ONE SHOULD BE HERE FAIRLY SOON.
>> MR. OLSON, REPORT ON RFQ, ENGINEERING RESPONSES.
>> WE'VE HAD A LOT OF QUESTIONS ASKED FROM MULTIPLE ENGINEERING FIRMS. I THINK I'VE HAD ROUGHLY 15, 16 REACH OUT.
I DID PUT THE ADDENDUMS OUT ON MONDAY FOR THE QUESTIONS THAT WERE ASKED.
THAT WAS FROM MULTIPLE ENGINEERING FIRMS. I THINK IT'S ABOUT FOUR PAGES LONG OF QUESTIONS AND THE CLARIFICATION ON THAT.
I KNOW WE GOT ONE IN LAST WEEK, GARY, WHEN I WASN'T HERE? WE DID GET ONE BID IN AT THIS POINT, AND WE'RE JUST GOING TO KEEP THEM ALL UNTIL THE 28TH, AND THEN WE'LL REVEAL THEM ALL THEREAFTER.
>> ANY ADDITIONAL UPDATES? AMY, YOU HAVE ONE.
I JUST WANTED TO REITERATE FOR THE CITY OF PARKER CONCERNING OUR ONGOING CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS ON THE MUD.
DESPITE WHAT MAY HAVE BEEN HEARD IN OTHER VENUES, THERE IS NO AGREEMENT, AND WE DO MAINTAIN OUR CONFIDENTIALITY AND CONTINUE WITH THE SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS.
>>YES, MADAM MAYOR. I HAVE ANOTHER UPDATE.
>> YES. I WOULD JUST LIKE TO NOTE FOR ANYONE WHO'S ATTENDING THIS MEETING, WHO WAS NOT ALSO ABLE TO JOIN US ONLINE OR IN PERSON FOR THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SPECIAL MEETING TODAY AT 4:30.
THAT MEETING WAS BEGUN AND STOPPED WITHIN ONE MINUTE, WHERE THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED DUE TO THE LACK OF PRESENCE OF A FULL QUORUM, WHERE COUNCILMEMBER REED ARRIVED AT 4:31.
[01:30:09]
>> FOR FUTURE REFERENCE, THAT'S NOT AN UPDATE.
THAT WOULD BE A COMMENT LATER ON IN THE MEETING.
ANY COMMENTS ON THE QUARTERLY REPORTS, THE MONTHLY REPORTS, ANYBODY? AS WE'RE GETTING READY TO GO ON THE REPORTS AND HOW WE LIKE THEM AND WHAT THEY NEED TO DO, PLEASE MAKE YOUR NOTES.
PAY ATTENTION TO THAT. THIS IS GOING TO BE ON AN AGENDA COMING UP PRETTY QUICKLY ON HOW WE WANT THE MONTHLY REPORTS FROM NOW ON.
[9. ACCEPTANCE OF DONATION(S) FOR POLICE, FIRE, AND CITY STAFF FOR THE RECORD (Each valued at between $0 - $500)]
ITEM NUMBER 9, ACCEPTANCE OF DONATIONS FOR POLICE, FIRE AND CITY STAFF.FOR THE RECORD, GREG AND JULIE RAY DONATED COOKIES VALUED AT $15 TO THE PARKER POLICE DEPARTMENT.
LAURA HERNANDEZ DONATED SNACKS AND CHIPS VALUED AT $100 TO THE POLICE DEPARTMENT.
WE THANK THEM AND ARE MOST GRATEFUL FOR THEIR GENEROSITY.
THANK YOU. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS.
[10. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS]
DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS AT THIS TIME?>> MADAM MAYOR, I WOULD LIKE TO CONTINUE WITH THE AGENDA FOR THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN.
>> I WILL ANNOUNCE FOR THE RECORD THAT AT THIS TIME, THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN SPECIAL MEETING WORKSHOP, HAS BEEN SET FOR MARCH 26TH AT 4:30 OR WAS IT 4:00?
>> EXCUSE ME, AT FOUR O'CLOCK.
IT IS OPEN TO ANYBODY THAT WOULD LIKE TO BE HERE AND HOPEFULLY WE WILL GO FORWARD WITH IT ON THAT DATE AND MAKE GREAT PROGRESS.
BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW IF YOU'LL ALWAYS NOTICE, IN YOUR PACKET THERE IS THE FUTURE AGENDA ITEM.
IF YOU HAVE EVER MADE A FUTURE AGENDA ITEM REQUEST EITHER HERE OR BY EMAIL AND YOUR ITEM ISN'T ON HERE, PLEASE LET US KNOW SO WE CAN CORRECT THAT.
BUT ONCE YOU'VE MADE A REQUEST, IT SHOULD BE REFLECTED ON HERE UNTIL WE'VE TAKEN CARE OF IT.
THIS COMES OUT WITH EVERY AGENDA THAT YOU GET.
IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE? COMMENTS?
>> MADAM MAYOR, I DON'T SEE ON THE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS THE REQUEST FOR THE STOP SIGNS AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF CREEKSIDE AND DUBLIN OR ESTATE AND DUBLIN UNLESS I MISSED IT.
I MADE AN ERROR. IT'S THERE. THANK YOU.
>> IT'S THERE. ANYTHING ELSE? IF THERE'S NOTHING ELSE, WE ARE ADJOURNED.
IT IS, TELL ME WHAT TIME-
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.