[CALL TO ORDER]
[00:00:08]
>> [BACKGROUND] [LAUGHTER] LET'S SEE, IT'S 07:04 PM.
WE'LL OPEN UP THIS MEETING OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON AUGUST 24TH, 2023, STARTING ABOUT FOUR MINUTES LATE.
WE WILL DO A ROLL CALL HERE REAL QUICKLY.
WE HAVE JASMAT, WE HAVE JOE, RUSSELL, AND WEI WEI HERE.
ARE WE HERE OR THERE'S SOMEONE ELSE THAT'S SUPPOSED TO BE HERE WHO'S MISSING?
>> YOU FOUR AND THEN JR AS THE DEVELOPER, AND STEVE SOLOMON AS THE ETJ OWNER.
THEY BOTH SAID THEY'D BE HERE, JR DID SAY HE'D BE A LITTLE BIT LATE ABOUT 7:30.
>> NEITHER I'M I, I DON'T KNOW. [LAUGHTER]
>> YOU ARE NOW, [INAUDIBLE] [LAUGHTER]
>> WE HAVE JASMAT SUTARIA HERE, WE HAVE JOE LOZANO HERE, WE HAVE WEI WEI JEANG HERE, AND WE HAVE RUSSELL WRIGHT HERE, AND JR IS GOING TO BE LATE.
>> WELL, WE'LL GO AHEAD AND DO THE PLEDGES AND GET THAT OUT OF THE WAY. OKAY?
>> RIGHT NOW WE ARE AT THE PUBLIC COMMENTS SECTION, DO WE HAVE ANY PUBLIC TO GIVE THE COMMENT? ARE WE LIVE-STREAMING THIS?
>> I KNOW, CAN YOU TELL IF ANYONE'S VIEWING?
>> [LAUGHTER] WE'RE NOT USING TECHNOLOGY HERE.
[1. WORK SESSION TO DISCUSS LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS ON LAND USE, ZONING, POPULATION, DENSITY SERVICE AREAS, GROWTH PATTERNS, AND BUILD OUT AND RELATED MATTERS RELATED TO LAWFUL IMPACT FEES.]
THIS IS A WORK SESSION TO DISCUSS THE LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS OR LAND USE, ZONING, POPULATION, DENSITY, SURFACE AREAS, GROWTH PATTERNS, AND BUILD OUT AND RELATED MATTERS RELATED TO LAWFUL IMPACT FEES.THIS IS PROBABLY GOING TO BE A SHORT MEETING HERE TODAY, I'M GUESSING, BECAUSE THIS IS MORE OF AN ORGANIZATION MEETING, I THINK, FOR THE FIRST TIME HERE.
THE ONE THING THAT I WILL BRING UP HERE IS THAT I ACTUALLY PRINTED IT OFF OUR REPORT FROM AUGUST OF 2016.
DOES ANYONE REMEMBER THAT? I GUESS WE'LL PROBABLY HEAR GARY FROM MAYBE ANYTHING YOU HAVE TO ADD OR RECOMMEND.
BUT I GUESS THAT ONE OF THE QUESTIONS I HAD IS THAT, WE MADE SOME PROJECTIONS BACK IN 2016.
I'M CURIOUS IF THEY WERE CLOSE, WAY OFF OR IT'S LIKE-
>> BECAUSE ONE OF THE THINGS I WOULD LIKE TO DO IS I WOULD LIKE TO GET ME SOME ACTUAL NUMBERS FROM YOU BECAUSE I STARTED READING THIS AND I WENT, MAN, I REMEMBER STAYING UP REALLY LATE DOING THIS IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT.
[LAUGHTER] ANYWAY, I THOUGHT I WOULD TAKE THE NATURAL NUMBERS AND PLUG THEM IN HERE AND SEE HOW CLOSE WE WERE.
>> [BACKGROUND] ANYWAY, SO THAT WAS BACK
[00:05:01]
IN AUGUST AFTER THAT WAS LIKE SEVEN YEARS AGO NOW.THAT'S THE AUGUST OF 2016, IT'S NOW AUGUST OF 2023.
WE HAVE SEVEN YEARS OF DATA TO COMPARE.
ARE THE GOALS OF THIS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE THE SAME AS THEY WERE FROM THE PAST?
>> BASICALLY GOING BACK, DOING AN UPDATE, SEEING WHERE WE ARE, AND THEN DETERMINING DO WE IMPACT TO USE THESE AND MAKE SENSE.
>> THAT'S WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO.
>> WITH THAT, I WILL ASK [INAUDIBLE]
>> ARE THE CHANGES TO THE STATE RULES GOING TO AFFECT US VERY MUCH?
>> THE MOST RECENT CHANGES, I DON'T THINK SO, NO. NOT YET.
>> I'VE HEARD THAT THEY WANT TO MAYBE DEVELOP SOME PROPERTY OVER THERE.
>> THERE'S BEEN SOME DISCUSSION, BUT THERE'S NO ACTION ON ANY OF THAT YET.
>> I BELIEVE IT HAS, I THINK IT'S FOR SALE AGAIN.
>> THAT'S ACTUALLY DISCUSSED ON PAGE 3, SPECIAL ACTIVITIES AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 188 ACRES, WHICH AT SOME POINT IN THE FUTURE CAN BE DEVELOPED SUBSEQUENTLY, SOME DIVIDE IT.
>> THEN I GUESS MY OTHER QUESTION IS, OF THE MORATORIUM.
I GUESS THAT REALLY DOESN'T HAVE ANY EFFECT ON US EITHER.
>> I GUESS FOR JOHN, DO WE HAVE ANY UPDATES FROM YOU?
>> TO ANSWER ONE OF YOUR QUESTIONS.
BACK IN THE WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM MASTER PLAN OF 2016, WE DID A POPULATION PROJECTION IN 2021.
WE PROJECTED TO ABOUT 5,900 PEOPLE.
IN OUR LATEST AUGUST 10TH TO COUNCIL, WE DID A METER COW AND RELAY THAT TO PEOPLE AND WE'RE RIGHT AT JUST UNDER 5,900.
WE'RE PRETTY CLOSE WITH THE MAGIC BALL.
I JUST WANTED TO GO OVER AND LOOK THE SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT FEE, SO IN HISTORY OF WATER.
BACK IN 2008, WE DID A WATER BASED DISTRIBUTION MASTER PLAN, THAT SET THINGS THAT WE NEED TO DO, AND THEIR HAVE PROJECTIONS OF A MAN.
WE CAME BACK IN 2016, AND WE UPDATED THAT, WHAT DISTRIBUTION REPORT, AGAIN THE PROJECTIONS AND SOME PROJECTS.
AT THAT TIME, WE DID A WATER IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS REPORT.
THE IMPACT FEE LAW AS IT STANDS TODAY, IS A 10 YEAR WINDOW, BUT YOU HAVE TO UPDATE IT EVERY FIVE YEARS.
WE'RE AT THAT FIVE YEAR POINT AND THAT WE NEED TO GO BACK AND LOOK AT IT.
AS WE GO BACK AND WE SAY, ARE THE IMPACT FEE IS WE HAVE TO ADOPT THE LAND USE PLAN, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS PLAN, AND THEN ESTABLISH THE FEE.
THE JOB OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE IS TO GIVE GUIDANCE AND ACCEPTANCE TO WHAT WE'RE GOING TO DO WITH LAND USE, THE CIP PROGRAM, AND IN THE PROCESS IN WHICH WE DO THE IMPACT FEE.
YOU GUYS DON'T HAVE ANY RESPONSIBILITY TO SET THE FEE OR EVEN TALK ABOUT THE FEE,
[00:10:02]
WHICH IS THE PROCESS.ONCE WE GET TO THAT POINT, THEN YOU WOULD WRITE A LETTER OF THE COUNCIL, TELLING THEM, YOU ALL THE ASSUMPTIONS THAT WERE MADE IN THE WAY WE'RE DOING THIS, THUMBS UP AND MOVE FORWARD TO THE ALL THEIR PUBLIC HEARINGS TO ESTABLISH THE FEE.
WHEN WE GO THROUGH THIS ANALYSIS, IT IS SCARY LOOK THAN I THOUGHT, AS THE LAND USE PLAN IN PARKER CHANGED FROM 2016.
WE WILL SIT HERE AND SAY, NO MAJOR CHANGE HAS OCCURRED, SO WE WOULD RECOMMEND TO THE ADVISOR COMMITTEE THAT WE ACCEPT THE LAND USE PLAN THAT WAS USED IN 2016 PLAN AND MOVE FORWARD.
WE TALKED ABOUT, SOME SOUTH FORK, WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN.
WE DON'T KNOW WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN.
WE WOULD TAKE IT FOR WHAT IT IS TODAY.
IN THE EVENT THAT MAKE IT TRACKS OF LAND DEVELOP IN THE CITY RESIDES, WE WANT TO HAVE HIGH DENSITY, 10 STORY APARTMENT COMPLEXES, WHATEVER.
THAT WOULD SAY, YOU NEED TO GO BACK AND LOOK AT YOUR IMPACT FEE AGAIN.
BUT IF WE'RE NOT MAKING CHANGES OR DENSITIES OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT WHEN YOU HAVE TO THE MOVE OF FORWARD PLAN.
THE SECOND PART OF THIS IS, WHAT IS THE CIP PROGRAM? WE'RE GOING TO GO BACK THROUGH UPDATE THE HYDRAULIC MODELS THAT WE HAVE.
THERE SOME PROJECTS THAT WERE COMPLETED THAT WILL LEND ITSELF TO WHAT THAT CIP WILL LOOK LIKE.
IN THIS NEXT 10 YEAR PERIOD, THE SECOND ELEVATED STORAGE TANKS WILL GO INTO THE CIP.
WE'LL LOOK AT THE LIVES AND MADE SURE THAT WE CAN FEED THAT AND THE SYSTEM WORKS.
WE HAVE A CONVERSATION THAT WAS CONSTRUCTED, AND THAT'S ALREADY IN THE IMPACT FEE.
THE CITY IS STILL WORKING NEGOTIATING WITH THE WATER DISTRICT IS DIVIDED BY SUPPLY WHERE WE CAN ACTUALLY TURN IT ON, SO THAT PROJECTS STILL STAYS IN.
WE CAN COLLECT THE MONEY ON IT AND WE WILL CONTINUE TO COLLECT THE MONEY IF THE COUNCIL ADOPTS SOME IMPACT FEE.
WE'LL CREATE A NEW CIP, AND THEN, THAT'S SOMETHING THAT YOU ALL WILL LOOK AT AND SAY THUMBS UP OR THUMBS DOWN AND WE'LL REVISE THAT.
THEN WE GET INTO RUNNING A 2023 HYDRAULIC MODEL OF 2033 MODEL AND BUILD-OUT, REPAIR AND BUILD OUT TO THE TWO OTHER MODELS IN THAT 10 YEAR PERIOD.
WE FIGURE OUT UTILIZED CAPACITY.
HOW MUCH IS THAT WATER IINE? HOW MUCH IS THE ELEVATED TANK IS BEING CONSUMED BY THE EXISTING PEOPLE? WE DO OUR POPULATION PROJECTIONS, WE KNOW WHAT THE POPULATION ABSORPTION WILL BE IN THAT 10 YEAR PERIOD, AND THAT'S WHAT WE CALCULATE THE FEE.
WE HAVE THIS BIG NUMBER DIVIDE BY THE NEW PEOPLE COMING IN.
WE WILL SET A MAXIMUM B, WHICH WE WILL THEN DIVIDE BY 50% TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW, BUT NOT GETTING INTO, BUT TO OTHER FINANCIAL ISSUES YOU'VE CALCULATED.
THEN COUNSEL CAN SET A FEE FROM ZERO UP TO THAT MAXIMUM AMOUNT, WHATEVER THEY SEE FIT.
THE B WILL BE GOOD FOR FIVE YEARS AND FIVE YEARS FROM NOW YOU GO THROUGH THE PROCESS AGAIN.
IF WE LOOK AT, YOU HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO SAY, ARE THERE ANY MAJOR CHANGES AND IF NOT, YOU CAN GO THROUGH PUBLIC CARE IN PROCESS AND EXTEND THAT CURRENT FEE.
WE KNOW TODAY WE'VE GOT TO GET THAT ELEVATED TANK IN THE NEXT 10 YEAR PERIOD.
I STARTED TO COLLECT SOME MONEY ON IT FOR PEOPLE THAT WOULD COME IN.
THAT'S THE PROCESS, THEN WE WILL GO THROUGH TODAY, WE WOULD LOOK FOR SOME CONCURRENCE THAT WE DON'T WANT TO DO ANYTHING DIFFERENT WITH LAND USE PLAN.
THAT WAS A DESIRE, THEN THE CITY WOULDN'T HAVE TO GO HIRE A LAND PLANNER AND THEY WOULD GO THROUGH IT AND WILL BE HERE NEXT YEAR THIS TIME ADOPTING THAT.
BASED ON MY EXPERIENCE WITH LAND USE PLANS, I'LL OPEN UP TO ANY QUESTIONS THAT ANY OF YOU ALL MAY HAVE.
>> WHEN WE HAVE THE YEAR 2021 THAT SAID.
>> I THINK IN THE PROJECTIONS,
[00:15:03]
IN THE REPORT, WE HAD 2021 PROJECTION.>> BUT IN 2023, WE JUST WENT THROUGH A METER COW AND HOW WE USE WATER TODAY AND CAME UP WITH JUST UNDER 59 HAPPENING SOMEWHERE.
AS YOU WERE WONDERING HOW CLOSE WERE WE ON THE PROJECTIONS WERE PRETTY CLOSE, WHICH IS SCARY THAT WE CAME TO THAT CLOSE.
WE'VE DONE SOME WATER DEMAND STUDIES, AND THAT WILL BE DISCUSSION THAT WE'LL HAVE WITH STAFF AS WE LOAD THE MODEL LAB.
WE DID THIS BACK IN 2008, WE DID IT AGAIN IN 2015 LOOKING AT HOW PEOPLE USE WATER.
THERE WAS A DECREASE IN WATER IN 2016 AS COMPARED TO 2008.
WHAT WE SEE TODAY, THAT PER CAPITA DEMAND IS BACK UP.
WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO USE THE HIGHER NUMBER IS PROBABLY THE CORRECT NUMBER.
DID YOU RUN THE MODEL AND SEE EVERYTHING SIZES OUT, HOW THE CAPACITY IS BEING UTILIZED WITH THAT HIGHER USAGE PER CAPITA BASIS.
I THINK IN THE PREVIOUS REPORT, WE WERE AT AROUND 575 GALLONS PER CAPITA PER DAY.
THE MAX DAY, WHICH OCCURS ON THE HOTTEST DAY IN THE SUMMER, JULY, AND AUGUST, FOR 2023, THE HOTTEST DAY.
>> YES, IT GETS WORSE, 666 GALLONS PER CAPITA PER DAY.
BUT WHAT WE KNOW SO FAR THIS SUMMER WAS IN MEAN JUNE AND JULY.
WE DON'T HAVE AUGUST NUMBERS AND I'M GOING TO ASK YOU [OVERLAPPING].
>> AUGUST IS GOING TO BE WORSE?
IN 2008, I THINK WE WERE [OVERLAPPING].
>> WE WERE AT 695 GALLONS PER CAPITA PER DAY.
WE WENT DOWN AND NOW WE'RE COMING BACK UP.
BECAUSE YOU HAD A REALLY HOT EXTENDING SUMMER.
IN THE SUMMER, THE MORE WATER THAT WE USE TO KEEP OUTSIDE GREEN, KEEP OUR PLANTS ALIVE.
THAT'S WHAT WE NEED TO BASE THE WATER SYSTEM ON IF WE CAN MEET THAT DEMAND. THAT'S A LOT OF WATER.
>> IT IS A LOT OF WATER [OVERLAPPING].
MAYBE WE CAN TALK ABOUT THIS LATER, BUT I'M ALWAYS CURIOUS IF YOU WERE TO TAKE A REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE OF LET'S SAY EAST [INAUDIBLE] AND YOU WERE TO COMBINE A NUMBER OF HOUSES INTO THE AVERAGE LOT SIZE THAT WE HAVE HERE.
I'M INTERESTED IN KNOWING HOW THE WATER USED TO BE PREPARED? YOU KNOW WHAT I'M SAYING THERE BECAUSE YOU HAD A WHOLE BUNCH OF GROUND, RIGHT?
>> WE'VE DONE A NUMBER OF DEMANDS STUDIES, WE'RE PLANNING OVER THE YEARS, NOTHING RECENT.
CAN WE MOVE NORTH TO ALLEN? WE HAVE SOME RECENT NUMBERS AT ALLEN, I THINK THAT WE DID ABOUT TWO YEARS AGO.
AGAIN, WE WERE SEEING A DROP IN THAT MAX DAY DEMAND AND WAS RUNNING AROUND 300 GALLONS PER CAPITA PER DAY.
OF COURSE, THERE'S FOUR UNITS PER ACRE, IN WHOLE AREA, ONE UNIT FOR TWO ACRES, GENERALLY.
BUT WHAT'S MORE INTERESTING IS HOW [INAUDIBLE] HOW MUCH WATER PER CERTAIN CITIES?
>> I WOULD SUSPECT IF WE DID A DEMAND STUDY NOW AND TODAY, WHICH I THINK ONE OF MY PARTNER IS GETTING READY TO DO, THAT THAT NUMBER WOULD BE BACK TO WHAT WE'VE SEEN IN THE PAST OF 375-425 GALLONS PER CAPITA PER DAY.
I THINK WHEN WE LOOK AT THE AUGUST NUMBERS, WE MAY BE BACK UP TO AROUND 700 GALLONS PER CAPITA PER DAY.
>> LIKE I SAY, WHAT I'M REALLY INTERESTED IN IS GALLONS PER SURFACE AREA, SO GALLONS PER ACRE.
>> [OVERLAPPING] BECAUSE I'M GUESSING WHEN YOU START DOING THE MATH, THE GALLON PER SURFACE AREA OR SOMETHING PER AREA, PROBABLY PRETTY GOING HIGH IN ALLEN.
>> YOU TAKE 350 AT FOUR UNITS PER ACRE AND THEY'RE AT 400 GALLONS PER CAPITA PRODUCTION, IT'S A BIG NUMBER.
[00:20:02]
YOU GET TO THE ACRE TO THE TWO ACRES.>> I MEAN, THAT'S JUST AN INTEREST TO ME BECAUSE WE GET TAGGED HERE AS USING A LOT OF WATER, BUT IF YOU PUT IT PER HEADCOUNT THEN IT LOOKS A LOT DIFFERENT WHEN YOU PUT IT ACROSS HOW MANY ACRES OF LAND.
>> IT'S DONE ON A PER HEADCOUNT BASED ON THE STATE OF TEXAS SENATE BILL ON WATER AND WE'RE IN REGENCY AND EVERYTHING IS ALWAYS PER PERSON WITH WATER CONSERVATION, EVERYTHING.
IT'S WHAT PER PERSON GOT ENTIRELY.
>> NOT THAT I WOULDN'T AGREE WITH THAT.
>> THEY'RE ASSUMING EVERYTHING IS BUILT OUT LIKE PLANO OR AN ALLEN.
>> SURE, I MEAN A LOT OF US ARE [INAUDIBLE] WHAT'S OUR NEXT STEP HERE? NEXT STEP HERE TO START GETTING INTO ACTUAL NEED TO SEND ANOTHER MEETING, WE HAVE DISCUSS SOME MAIN POINTS.
>> WHERE WE ARE TODAY, WE JUST GOT AUTHORIZATION TO GET STARTED ON THIS LAST WEEK AND TURNS OUT WE'RE HAVING A MEETING TONIGHT.
[LAUGHTER] AS I SAID, WE WILL LOOK FOR SOME ACTION WHETHER TONIGHT OR AT YOUR NEXT MEETING THAT Y'ALL RECOMMEND THAT WE UTILIZE EXISTING LAND USE PLAN, THAT'S NUMBER 1.
NUMBER 2, WE'RE GOING TO COME BACK ONCE WE DO ALL OUR COMPUTER RUNS, AND THAT'S GOING TO BUY DOUGLAS SOME MONTHS OR SO, TWO MONTHS THAT WE WERE TO COME BACK WITH THE CIP PROGRAM.
HANDFUL OF PROJECTS BECAUSE THAT'S ALL YOU REALLY HAVE.
THEN ONCE WE GET THROUGH THAT, THEY WOULD COME BACK WITH THE IMPACT FEE.
WE MAY DO THE CIP AND THE IMPACT FEE IN A SINGLE MEETING AND SAYING, THIS IS THE CIP THAT WE GENERATED BASED ON THAT, IF YOU'RE GOOD WITH THIS, THIS IS THE RESULTS OF THE IMPACT FEE.
PUTTING THOSE PROJECTS IN, SO IT'S REALLY THE DOLLAR AMOUNT.
WE'VE DONE LAND USE, SO WE KNOW THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE COMING BACK IN, DIVIDING THAT YOU GET THE FEE.
>> WHAT KIND OF TIMELINE IN TERMS OF WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING AT?
>> I THINK ABOUT TWO MONTHS, IF WE HAD A MEETING IN ABOUT TWO MONTHS WE SHOULD BE ABLE TO HAVE THAT TO YOU.
>> THAT WOULD BE ENOUGH TIME [INAUDIBLE]
>> CORRECT. IF WE GET IT DONE SOONER, GARY IS GOING TO BRING IT BACK SOONER.
ONCE WE COME BACK AND GO OVER THE CIP, WE GO BACK OVER THE FEE CALCULATIONS HOW WE DID IT, AT THAT POINT, YOU'RE READY TO MOVE IT TO COUNCIL.
>> WILL THERE BE A PUBLIC HEARING ON THAT?
>> I THINK IT'S THE COUNCIL, BUT I'LL DOUBLE-CHECK. IT'S BEEN FIVE YEARS.
I'LL DOUBLE-CHECK, I DON'T RECALL AT THE PNZ OR THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE IF WE DO THE PUBLIC HEARING.
>> YEAH, YOU USUALLY DO THE PUBLIC HEARING, HOW DOES IT FEEL?
>> IT COMES AT CITY COUNCIL, I DON'T BLAME YOU BECAUSE I DON'T REMEMBER.
>> THE ACTUAL NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS, I SUPPOSE.
>> I GUESS THE NEXT TIME WE MEET WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO PROBABLY SCHEDULE THE NEXT MEETING AT SOME POINT.
I GUESS THAT BEING IT SOUNDS TO ME LIKE WE NEED TO GET ALL OF OUR LINKS, NUMBERS, AND DATA TOGETHER AND START DISCUSSING WHAT WE THINK ARE ON TRACK OR WHERE WE ARE, MIGHT BE VERY QUICK.
>> WE DO IT ALL, BUT WE'RE REALLY TELLING YOU HOW WE DID IT AND THAT'S WITH Y'ALL ARE BLESSING, IT'S NOT REALLY FOR Y'ALL TO DO ANY CALCULATION.
>> RUSSELL, ARE YOU GOOD WITH USING THE LAND-USE PLAN AS IT IS?
>> YEAH. I THINK EVERYBODY WOULD AGREE THAT WOULD BE FINE FOR A START.
[00:25:01]
>> NOT THE LAND USE. BUT IT HASN'T CHANGED SIGNIFICANTLY.
>> WE HAVEN'T GOTTEN BIGGER WITH MORE LAND USE [LAUGHTER] REQUIRED.
>> YOU HAVEN'T CHANGED ANY DENSITIES UP OR DOWN?
>> WE DON'T HAVE ANY ZONING CLASSIFICATION, WE DON'T HAVE THAT, SO [LAUGHTER] WELL, IN THAT CASE, WE CAN PROBABLY ADJOURN.
>> YOU WANT TO SET A DATE, ATTENDING THE DATE FOR ANOTHER MEETING, TWO MONTHS OUT?
>> WE CAN DO THAT WHILE WE'RE HERE.
>> THEN IF WE NEED TO COME BACK SOONER THEN WE CAN DO THAT.
THAT WAY YOU CAN NOTE IT DOWN AND LET HIM ADJOURN.
>> THE 26TH OF OCTOBER, MAYBE?
>> CAN WE HAVE SEPTEMBER 26TH? [BACKGROUND] IT'S ENOUGH TIME TO GET THAT.
>> I WILL GIVE YOU, IS WHAT YOU WOULD LIKE ME TO, IS THE CIP MAP THAT WE HAD LAST TIME.
>> A LOT OF PROVINCES, SOMETHING THAT WE ALL ORIGINALLY ADDED, THERE'S THE ELEVATED ACRE.
>> OCTOBER 19TH WAS GOING TO BE ADDED FOR THE NEXT MEETING? [INAUDIBLE] FOR THE LAST FEW YEARS.
>> WHAT I'LL DO IS I'LL PROBABLY START PUTTING IN THINGS IN MY SPREADSHEET.
>> JUST CALL ME WHEN YOU GET A MINUTE AND WE'LL TALK ABOUT IT, FIGURE OUT WHAT WE NEED TO GET AND WE'LL GET IT.
>> SOUNDS GOOD. ANYTHING ELSE BEFORE WE ADJOURN?
>> THIS COMMITTEE WILL BE THE NEXT MEETING?
>> WELL, GUYS, IT'S [NOISE] IT IS 7:42 PM [NOISE] WE ARE ADJOURNED.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.