OKAY. LET'S. LET'S START THERE.
[00:00:04]
SO IT'S 72.[CALL TO ORDER]
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING FOR THE CITY OF PARKER ON AUGUST 25TH, 2022, AND IT'S 7:02 P.M.AND ROLL CALL TODAY WE'VE GOT RUSSELL RYDER, LOZANO DESERT AREA, MARY JANE AND LARKIN CRUTCHER AS AN ALTERNATE WILL FILL IN TONIGHT.
WHAT IS TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.
I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE TEXAS ONE STATE UNDER GOD NO.
[1. CONSIDERATION AND/OR ANY APPROPRIATE ACTION REGARDING APPROVAL OF THE MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE 9, 2022.]
HEY, FIRST ITEM ON THE AGENDA.IS THE ACTION AN APPROPRIATE ACTION REGARDING THE APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE NINE, 2022? LET'S SEE.
OKAY, SO DOES EVERYBODY HAVE A COPY OF THE MEETING? WE? JERRY, DO YOU HAVE ANY COPIES OF THE MINUTES THAT.
WELL, THE PACKAGE WAS ELECTRONIC.
YEAH. YOU NEED COPIES? YEAH. I THINK WE PROBABLY NEED A CUP OF COFFEE.
SO THE MEETING MINUTES FROM JUNE 9TH WE HAD RUSSELL.
RIGHT. JOE LOZANO WEI WEI JEAN.
OKAY PERSON TO APPROVE THE MEETING.
[2. PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING REQUEST FOR PERMANENT ZONING ON APPROXIMATELY 14.926 ACRES OF LAND IN THE CITY OF PARKER, TEXAS, GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE RICHARD SPARKS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 850, TRACTS 1 THROUGH 4, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS TO SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (SF).]
LAND IN THE CITY OF PARKER, TEXAS, GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE RICHARD SPARKS SURVEY.ABSTRACT NUMBER 850 134 COLLIER COUNTY, TEXAS TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MEMBER SF CLASSIFICATION.
SO WE ARE GOING TO OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING.
[00:05:02]
AT 7:07 P.M..THE OTHER DAY. DO WE HAVE ANY.
DO WE HAVE ANY CARDS FILLED OUT? NO, SIR. DO WE HAVE ANYBODY HERE? JUST THE CHICKEN. OKAY.
WELL, IT'S GOING TO BE A SHORT PUBLIC HEARING, SO THERE ARE NO COMMENTS TO BE MADE.
WE'RE GOING TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 7:08 P.M..
OKAY. SO WE'VE HAD NO COMMENTS THERE.
[3. CONSIDERATION AND/OR AN APPROPRIATE ACTION ON THE LOVEJOY NEW VENTURE LLC REQUEST FOR PERMANENT ZONING ON APPROXIMATELY 14.926 ACRES OF LAND IN THE CITY OF PARKER, TEXAS, GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE RICHARD SPARKS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 850, TRACTS 1 THROUGH 4, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS TO SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (SF).]
SO ITEM THREE ON THE AGENDA, CONSIDERATION AND OR APPROPRIATE ACTION ON THE LOVEJOY NEW VENTURE LLC REQUEST FOR PERMANENT VOTING ON APPROXIMATELY 14.96 ACRES IN THE LAND.THE CITY OF PARKER, TEXAS, GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE RICHARDS PARK SURVEY.
ABSTRACT NUMBER EIGHT 5524 COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS.
TWO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.
SO RIGHT NOW, THAT IS THAT'S INSIDE THE CITY OF PARK, CORRECT? IT'S BEEN IN TO MINUTE, RIGHT? IT WAS YET.
S.F. IS IS NORMAL A TWO ACRE MINIMUM LOTS RIGHT THERE AGREEABLE TO THE MINIMUM ONE.
AND SO I SEE I SEE SEVEN, SEVEN LOTS COMING OUT OF THAT.
NO ACTUALLY WHAT IS IT, SIX LINES.
YEAH. SO DOES ANYONE HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY ABOUT THE.
THANK YOU. JUST A SINGLE PENNY.
WOULD YOU LIKE TO COME UP AND EXPLAIN? BRANDON BUSH 611 REDWOOD CREEK, FAIRVIEW, TEXAS.
BRYANT CORBETT, TWO SIXTIES DAVIS STREET, AN ENGINEER FOR THE PROJECT.
I'VE BEEN LOOKING AT THIS PROPERTY FOR QUITE SOME TIME.
SO WE'LL BE THE DEVELOPER AND THE BUILDER ON IT AS WELL.
ANYBODY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OF THE DEVELOPER AND BUILDER WE'VE BEEN TELLING YOU ABOUT A LOT? YEAH, SURE. SOUNDS PRETTY.
SOUNDS PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD TO ME.
I'M NOT I'M NOT COMING UP WITH ANY CRAZY QUESTIONS AT THE MOMENT.
NOW, THIS IS ABOUT AS STRAIGHTFORWARD AS IT GETS.
SO WHAT'S THE CATCH? WHAT'S THE CATCH NOW? I MEAN, BECAUSE NORMALLY WE ALWAYS HAVE TO DEAL WITH, OH, WE WANT TO MAKE THEM THREE QUARTERS AND MAKE SURE THAT SOMETHING LIKE THIS IS GREAT.
THANKS. THANK YOU. YOU'RE MAKING OUR JOB EASY TODAY.
OKAY. SO WE NEED TO HAVE SOMEBODY HERE MAKE A MOTION THAT WE RECOMMEND TO COUNCIL TO CHANGE THE ZONING TO SINGLE FAMILY FOR THIS VENTURE.
LIKE EARLY. MAKE A MOTION RECOMMENDED TO CITY COUNCIL THE CITY REQUEST FOR PERMANENT ZONING TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.
I'VE BEEN VERY SICKENED BY LIVING ON PAPER.
[00:10:01]
NOW YOU HAVE ANOTHER PUBLIC LINING UP OUTSIDE IN IRVING.[4. PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING UPDATING CITY MAPS: (I) THE ANNEXATION/BOUNDARY MAP, (II) THE ZONING MAP, AND (III) THE THOROUGHFARE MAP.]
WE'RE GOING TO OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING UPDATING OF CITY MAPS, THE ANNEXATION BOUNDARY MAP, THE ZONING MAP AND THE THOROUGHFARE MAP.GO AHEAD AND CALL THE TIME OUT. JUST FOR THE RECORD, AT THE TIME WE'RE OPENING IT.
AND WE'LL WAIT A LITTLE BIT HERE.
ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS PUSH THE BUTTON.
WELL, THERE'S NOBODY HERE TO SAY ANYTHING FOR PUBLIC COMMENT.
SO AT 7:13 P.M., WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
SO NOW WE'RE KIND OF GETTING DOWN TO KIND OF THE SAME THING.
[5. CONSIDERATION AND/OR ANY APPROPRIATE ACTION ON UPDATING CITY MAPS, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION AND APPROVAL OF: (I) THE ANNEXATION/BOUNDARY MAP, (II) THE ZONING MAP, AND (III) THE THOROUGHFARE MAP.]
ITEM FIVE CONSIDERATION AND OR APPROPRIATE ACTION ON UPDATING CITY MAPS, RECOMMENDING THE ADOPTION AND APPROVAL OF THE ANNEXATION BOUNDARY MAP, THE ZONING MAP AND THE THOROUGHFARE MAP.OKAY WITH THAT? DO WE HAVE ANY COMMENTS FROM OUR CITY PERSONNEL ABOUT ALL OF THESE MATTERS? WE'VE GONE THROUGH THESE MAPS AND GONE THROUGH THESE MAPS AND GONE THROUGH THESE MAPS, AND THEN WE WENT THROUGH THEM SOME MORE.
I THINK WE GOT I THINK WE GOT EVERYTHING STRAIGHTENED OUT IN HERE.
THIS HAS BEEN A VERY INVOLVED PROCESS.
OKAY. SO WHAT WHICH WHAT IS THE.
I GUESS THE QUESTION I HAVE IS, WHAT'S THE MOST DIFFICULT ASPECT OF THIS ONE RIGHT HERE? OKAY. THE INDEXATION THAT OUR ENGINEER HAD TO TAKE ALL OF OUR ANNEXATION DOCUMENTS ALL AND IMPLEMENT ALL OF THEM.
OKAY. SO THIS IS ALL OVER ALL THE TIME? YES, JUST THE BEGINNING. SINCE THE BEGINNING OF TIME, SINCE DAY ONE.
YOU DIDN'T HAVE A MAP LIKE THAT? WE DID, BUT IT WAS INACCURATE.
WE DO PEOPLE THAT COME BEHIND US AND THEY DON'T KNOW THAT.
BUT WE DO. AND THIS THIS WAS THE THE ORIGINAL MAPS WERE A WIN.
WHEN WE STARTED IN 69, WHEN THE ORIGINAL MAPS CAME IN THE EARLY SEVENTIES AND THEN HAD A MAP FROM 15 OR SO YEARS AGO, THAT WAS WE WEREN'T ABLE TO TRACK EVERYTHING WITH IT.
AND SO WE'VE GOT A BRAND NEW YEAH, WE'VE GOT A BIGGER COPY OF IT HERE.
IT WAS ELECTRONICALLY IN THE PACKAGE.
ADMITTEDLY, THERE'S A LOT ON THERE.
YES. BUT YOU CAN SEE WHERE HE TRACKED FROM THE BEGINNING, THE TOWN POUNDING THROUGH ALL THE INNOVATION AND ALL THE SWAPS, YOU KNOW, OR JUST THE GOSSIP TABLE. RIGHT. WE'VE GOT THE TABLE AND THE BACK NUMBERS ON THE LEFT.
SO IT HAS BEEN THIS ONE HAS BEEN REBUILT COMPLETELY.
AND WE'RE TRYING I SPENT SOME TIME UP AT THE COUNTY DOING A LOT OF RESEARCH FOR THAT.
SO IT WAS IT'S A VERY INVOLVED PROCESS.
THIS IS TO GET TO ROCKEFELLER BOARDING.
NO, NOT MICROFILM. WE HAD TO PULL OUT SOME FLATS, SO WE HAD TO GO PULL DRAWERS AND FILES.
SO YEAH, WE'VE WE'VE WORKED HARD ON THESE MAPS AND I HOPE THEY'RE WHAT EVERYBODY IS LOOKING FOR.
I DON'T THINK YOU'RE GETTING ANY MORE ACCURATE THAN WHAT WE'VE GOT IN THIS MAP TODAY.
WOW. THAT'S COOL. THAT'S AWESOME.
AND OF COURSE, THE THOROUGHFARE PLAN, THE THOROUGHFARE MAP.
WE'VE UPDATED THAT WITH SOME CHANGES.
SO WHAT IF YOU WERE TO CAN YOU SUMMARIZE KIND OF THE THOROUGHFARE? I MEAN, ANY PARTICULAR MAJOR CHANGES JUST FOR WHAT I HAVE IN THE PREVIOUS VERSION IN FRONT OF ME? IT'S BEEN A WHILE ON THIS ONE AND BUT THERE WAS AN ON THE BACK SIDE OF BROOKS
[00:15:02]
FARM, A THOROUGHFARE PLAN THROUGH THERE THAT SHOWED THE LINE THROUGH THE BACKYARDS OF PEOPLE ON THE WEST EDGE OF BROOKS ARM.AND SO THEY WERE REALLY WORRIED THAT THAT WAS WHERE THEY WOULD PUT A ROAD.
THAT THE THOROUGHFARE PLAN IS A WASTE SPRAY.
IF WE GET THOSE ROADS, THAT'S WHERE WE WANT THEM IN THAT AREA.
DON'T HAVE TO BE RIGHT IN THAT EXACT SPOT.
YEAH. SO IN ORDER TO EASE THEIR MINDS, WE SIMPLY TOOK IT OFF.
SO THE CITY ENGINEERS WORK ON THAT AS WELL.
YES. AND SO WE HAVE AN IDEA OF THE NUMBER OF CARS TRAVERSING HERE AND THERE.
NO, THIS THIS IS MORE OF JUST A WISH LIST OF WHAT THE CITY WOULD LIKE TO SEE.
YEAH. THIS IS NOT AN ENGINEER.
SOMEBODY. SO WE DON'T HAVE LIKE A.
UNDERGROUND. THROUGH THE CLAY AND ROCK.
BELOW THE WATER. BELOW THE WATER.
BELOW. YOUR NAME IS LOCAL AND THIS MATCHES UP WITH THE COUNTY.
WE'LL HAVE TO SEND THIS TO THE COUNTY ONCE IT'S APPROVED.
THE COUNTY HAS OUR OWN VERSION.
SO NO FOUR LANE DIVIDE THE HIGHWAYS ANYMORE? NOT ANYTIME SOON. JUST DELAY.
OKAY. ANYONE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS ABOUT.
I LIKE YOUR RIGHT IN THERE, BUT THAT ALWAYS HELPS.
DO WE HAVE I MEAN, ARE THESE ELECTRONIC VERSIONS ON OUR WEBSITE? NOT YET. CAN WE DO THAT? WE'LL DO THAT. WOULD WE WOULD WE END UP WITH WITH INTERACTIVE.
ANY KIND OF INTERACTIVE MAPS HERE OR IS IT.
I DON'T THINK SO. IF THEY GOING TO GO THAT FAR JUST YET, WHERE WE'RE GOING, SOME OTHER STUFF.
IT'S IN ITS INFANCY AT THE MOMENT.
WE'RE WE'RE THINKING ABOUT SOME JAZZ TYPE STUFF.
RIGHT. AND THAT WOULD BRING ON SOME INTERACTIVE TALKING ABOUT POSSIBLY.
BUT MAINLY WE NEED IT FOR OUR STUFF.
RIGHT. AND IF IF WE DO SOMETHING INTERACTIVE, IT WILL BE THAT WILL BE AN.
OKAY. WELL, THEN WHAT I WOULD LIKE HERE IS TO SEE IF WE CAN GET A MOTION FOR RECOMMENDING THE APPROVAL OF THE ADOPTION OF THE THREE MAPS THERE AND THE ANNEXATION BOUNDARY AND THE ZONE MAP AND THE.
I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL FOR THE DOCTRINE AND APPROVAL OF THE ANNEXATION BOUNDARY MAP, THE ZONING MAP, AND REFER TO A RECOMMENDATION ALSO SECONDED BY LARKIN.
AND SO WE WILL VOTE ALL IN FAVOR.
PASSES BY. WE CAN DO THINGS AND NOT COMPLICATE THINGS.
[FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS]
ANY ANY FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS, YOU KNOW ABOUT THAT? WE'RE WE'RE IN DISCUSSION WITH KINGS CROSSING, PHASE FIVE, WHITE STONE, PHASE FOUR.THOSE WILL BE COMING VERY SOMETIME IN THE NEAR FUTURE, PROBABLY.
SO WITH RISING INTEREST RATES, IS ANYTHING SLOWING DOWN OR.
NO? KNOW OUR MARKETS YOU NEED.
EVERYBODY STILL WANTS TO BE HERE.
YOU MAY HAVE ANY COMMENTS HERE BEFORE WE ADJOURN THIS MEETING?
[00:20:01]
OKAY. OKAY.WELL, I'M GOING TO CALL THIS MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:22 P.M..
2920 MINUTES.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.