4. CONSIDERATION AND/OR ANY APPROPRIATE ACTION ACCEPTING A DONATION IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $26,500 FROM THE PARKER WOMEN’S CLUB (PWC), TO BE ALLOCATED AS FOLLOWS

[4. CONSIDERATION AND/OR ANY APPROPRIATE ACTION ACCEPTING A DONATION IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $26,500 FROM THE PARKER WOMEN’S CLUB (PWC), TO BE ALLOCATED AS FOLLOWS]

OR ANY APPROPRIATE ACTION EXCEPTING A DONATION IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $26,500 FROM THE PARKER WOMEN'S CLUB TO BE ALLOCATED AS FOLLOWS $500 FOR ADMINISTRATION FOR LOGO T SHIRTS.

$2,000 FOR BOOTS FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT.

$10,000 FOR LIFE PACKS FOR THE FIRE DEPARTMENT AND $14,000 FOR NEW BENCHES AND PICNIC TABLES

[00:05:10]

AND PARK REPAIRS FOR AND IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARKS AND RECREATION.

AT THIS TIME, I WILL ASK FOR A MOTION TO ACCEPT THIS DONATION.

MADAM MAYOR, I WILL MOVE THAT WE ACCEPT THE DONATION WITH OUR SINCERE GRATITUDE FROM THE PARKER WOMEN'S CLUB IN THE AMOUNT OF $26,500 AS SPECIFIED ON THE AGENDA.

IS THERE A SECOND? I WILL SECOND THAT, MADAM CHAIR.

WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND TO ACCEPT THE $26,000 DOLLARS [INAUDIBLE] $26,500 DOLLARS AS DESCRIBED.

IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? OK NOT HEARING ANY I'LL CALL FOR YOUR VOTE.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF ACCEPTING THIS DONATION TO BE ALLOCATED AS DESCRIBED PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.

ANYONE AGAINST IT? DIDN'T THINK THERE WOULD BE OK.

[LAUGHTER] MOTION PASSES FOUR ZERO.

AND AT THIS TIME I WOULD LIKE TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE PARKER WOMEN'S CLUB.

WE HAVE THEM HERE.

PLEASE COME FORWARD.

WE HAVE ROXANNE BOGDAN.

PAULA JOHNSTON-HUTKA, JILL LAMBOUSES.

[APPLAUSE] LEANNE YOU JUST GOING TO KIND OF HANG OUT OVER THERE? SHE'S OUR PARK REPRESENTATIVE.

[LAUGHTER] I HAVE A QUESTION.

THE WAY THIS WAS WORDED ON HERE, I DON'T KNOW IF LIKE WE DIDN'T SPECIFY THAT IT WAS T SHIRTS.

WE WANT YOU ALL TO BE ABLE TO PICK WHAT SHIRTS YOU WANT.

THAT'S FINE. SO THAT'S OKAY.

AND THEN YOU MENTIONED THAT IT WAS LIFE PACKS FOR THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.

IT'S ACTUALLY 10,000 TOWARDS ONE LIFE PACK DEFIBRILLATOR.

OKAY. SO I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU ALL ARE CLEAR ON THAT, THAT IT'S NOT JUST, HOW THAT WAS WORDED.

THAT'S FINE.

WOULD YOU LIKE TO TAKE A PHOTO? YES. CAN I SAY A WORD? SURE. I MADE A LITTLE SHORT SPEECH.

OH, GOOD. JUST, YOU KNOW, SO THAT I CAN RECOGNIZE OTHERS.

SO I HAVE SERVED ON THE PARKER WOMEN'S CLUB FOR THE LAST THREE YEARS AS PRESIDENT.

AND THOSE WHO OCCUPIED MY BOARD POSITIONS FOR 2021 AND 2022 ESPECIALLY WERE STELLAR WOMEN WHO GAVE MUCH OF THEIR TIME, ENERGY AND RESOURCES.

THEY ARE KIMBERLY HINSHAW, VICE PRESIDENT OF PROGRAMS. TRICIA FECHT, MEMBERSHIP.

MARY ANN KILPATRICK, OUTREACH, PRERNA SACHDEVA, FUNDRAISING, ROXANNE BOGDAN, SECRETARY, WHO IS HERE THIS EVENING.

JILL LAMBOUSES, TREASURER, WHO IS ALSO HERE THIS EVENING, AND KRISTIN AZBELL, OUR PARLIAMENTARIAN.

PARKER WOMEN'S CLUB IS A 501C3 ORGANIZATION THAT PROVIDES AN OPPORTUNITY FOR THE WOMEN OF PARKER TO SUPPORT THEIR CITY.

THE CLUB OFFERS AN AVENUE FOR COMMUNITY SERVICE, CHARITY AND FELLOWSHIP.

THIS YEAR'S FUNDRAISING EFFORTS AND EVENT OF WHICH THE ABOVE LISTED BOARD MEMBERS PLAYED A HUGE ROLE IN ACCOMPLISHING, WAS A RECORD BREAKING IN THE AMOUNT OF FUNDS RAISED.

ON BEHALF OF THE PARKER WOMEN'S CLUB I AM PLEASED TO PRESENT THIS AMOUNT TO THE CITY OF PARKER A CHECK FOR $26,500 AND YOU HAVE ALREADY LISTED HOW IT WILL BE DISBURSED.

WE WERE ALSO ABLE TO GIVE FIVE SCHOLARSHIPS TO PARKER RESIDENT GRADUATING SENIORS TOTALING $7,500.

AND WE JUST WANT TO THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR SERVICE AS YOU GIVE OF YOUR OWN TIME, ENERGY AND RESOURCES FOR THE GREATER GOOD OF OUR COMMUNITY.

SO CONGRATULATIONS TO ALL OF US.

AND THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

THANK YOU. [APPLAUSE] THAT WAY THE PARKER LOGO ISN'T OBSCURED.

THANK YOU. GREAT JOB.

THANK YOU SO MUCH.

[APPLAUSE] THE CITY IS MOST GRATEFUL FOR YOUR ONGOING AND GENEROUS SUPPORT OVER THE YEARS.

WE CAN'T THANK YOU ENOUGH.

[00:10:03]

OKAY.

OK. NEXT ITEM IS ITEM NUMBER FIVE.

[5. POSSIBLE TEMPORARY MORATORIUM EXTENSION]

POSSIBLE TEMPORARY MORATORIUM EXTENSION.

AT THIS TIME, WE WILL HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE TEMPORARY MORATORIUM.

DID MR. BIRKHOFF WANT TO SAY ANYTHING AT THIS TIME BEFORE THE PUBLIC HEARING? YES, MA'AM. I THINK HE'S GOT A QUICK UPDATE FOR WE'VE PROVIDED THE LETTER IN THE BACK UP, BUT HE'S HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE ON IT SUPPORTING HIS OPINION REGARDING THE MORATORIUM AND THE EXTENSION THEREOF.

THANK YOU. OK JOHN BIRKHOFF WITH BIRKHOFF HENDRICKS & CARTER, DALLAS, TEXAS.

AS I UNDERSTAND, YOU HAVE OUR RECENT LETTER TALKING ABOUT WATER SUPPLY.

WE DID A LETTER BACK IN MARCH THAT STARTED THE MORATORIUM.

AND THIS HAS TO DO, YOU KNOW, COMPARING THE PLATTED PROPERTIES THAT YOU ALL HAVE APPROVED, HOUSES GOING IN AND WHAT THAT LOOKS LIKE AS WE PROJECT OUT.

SO WHEN WE LOOKED AT IT LAST TIME, YOU KNOW, YOUR POPULATION IS RUNNING AROUND 56, 5,700 PEOPLE.

AND AS WE LOOKED AT THE RECORDS FROM THE LAST COUPLE OF SUMMERS, THEY'VE KIND OF VARIED, YOU KNOW, 400 TO 500 GALLONS PER CAPITA PER DAY FOR THE MAX DAY.

SO AS WE LOOK TO TODAY, YOU KNOW, WE'RE YOU KNOW, IF WE HAVE THAT TYPE OF DEMAND OCCURRING, WE'RE PROBABLY GOING TO USE ABOUT 3 MILLION GALLONS A DAY.

YOU HAVE A CONTRACT WITH NORTH TEXAS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT FOR THREE AND A HALF MILLION GALLONS A DAY.

SO, YOU KNOW, WE'RE SITTING HERE PRETTY GOOD.

BUT AS WE LOOK AT THE LOTS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN BUILT YET AND THERE'S ABOUT 830 OF THOSE LOTS AS THEY COME ONLINE, THAT'S GOING TO START TO DIMINISH THAT RESERVE THAT YOU HAVE.

AND IF ALL THOSE LOTS WERE ON THE GROUND TODAY, YOUR DEMAND WOULD BE IS PROJECTED TO BE ABOUT 3.8 MILLION GALLONS A DAY.

SO NOW WE'RE OVER THE SUPPLY FROM THE DISTRICT.

AND SO WHAT WE HAVE RECOMMENDED YOU KNOW BACK IN MARCH AND AS WE LOOKED AT NUMBERS AGAIN TODAY, YOU'RE 90 DAY MORATORIUM PERIOD IS UP AND THAT SHOULD BE EXTENDED THAT WE'RE NOT APPROVING LOTS UNTIL WE GET A CONTRACT WITH NORTH TEXAS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT TO GET ADDITIONAL SUPPLY, WHICH WOULD THEN GO TO THE CENTRAL PUMP STATION.

AND SO OUR RECOMMENDATION IS THAT, YOU KNOW, YOU EXTEND THAT MORATORIUM UNTIL WE GET A CONTRACT WITH THE DISTRICT.

AND OPEN IT UP FOR ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.

ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME COUNCIL? OK. THEN I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

IT IS 7:13 P.M..

IS THERE ANYBODY THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THE WATER MORATORIUM? IT'S NOT. GO AHEAD.

IT'S NOT SPECIFICALLY LIMITED TO JUST WATER.

I MEAN, THAT'S THE KEY OF IT.

BUT ALSO AT THIS POINT, IT ALSO INVOLVES OUR COMP PLAN FOR THE RECORD, IT'S BOTH REASONS UNDERLYING THE MORATORIUM.

OKAY. DOES ANYBODY WANT TO SPEAK ABOUT IT AT ALL? WATER, LAND, WHATEVER.

NOT SEEING ANYBODY THEN I AM CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 7:14 P.M.

. AT THIS TIME, WE WILL MOVE TO ITEM FIVE PART B, WHICH IS CONSIDERATION AND OR ANY APPROPRIATE ACTION ON ORDINANCE NUMBER 815, EXTENDING THE TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ENACTED BY ORDINANCE NUMBER 812 ON THE ACCEPTANCE OF NEW REVIEW AND APPROVALS NECESSARY FOR THE SUBDIVISION SITE PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT OR CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS AND EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF PARKER.

OK.

COUNCIL, DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? COMMENTS? IF NOT, I WILL ACCEPT A MOTION.

MADAM MAYOR, I MOVE THAT WE ACCEPT ORDINANCE NUMBER 812 FOR.

815. OH, EXCUSE ME, 815.

THANK YOU. OKAY.

IS THAT ENOUGH? THAT'S ENOUGH.

DO WE HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND THAT MADAM MAYOR.

OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER LYNCH, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER MEYER TO APPROVE ORDINANCE

[00:15:05]

NUMBER 815.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION AT ALL? IF NOT, WE'LL CALL FOR YOUR VOTE.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.

ALL THOSE OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES FOUR ZERO.

THANK YOU. NOW WE WILL GO TO ITEM NUMBER SIX

[6. DONIHOO FARMS, LTD.]

CONSIDERATION AND OR ANY APPROPRIATE ACTION ON ORDINANCE NUMBER 816 REGARDING A MUNICIPAL SERVICES AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE 830672 BETWEEN THE CITY OF PARKER AND DONIHOO FARMS LTD FOR THE PROVISION OF CITY SERVICES TO APPROXIMATELY 3 8-777 ACRES OF LAND REQUESTED BY THE OWNER TO BE ANNEXED.

THIS LAND IS GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE THOMAS ESTES SURVEY ABSTRACT NUMBER 298, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT, PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

OK. ANY COMMENTS BY COUNCIL? I HAVE A FEW.

OK. ONE, I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S JUST A CLERICAL, BUT I SEE ON PAGE 96 IT SAYS 38.778 ACRES.

WHEN I LOOK ON THE PAGE 93 AND THE OTHER DOCUMENTS, IT HAS 44.786 ACRES.

IS THAT A MISNOMER THERE OR? NO SORRY. YOU MIGHT BE LOOKING AT AN OLDER PACKET.

I THINK WE CORRECTED THAT AFTER THE ORIGINAL PACKET WENT OUT.

BUT IT SHOULD BE IT SHOULD BE 38.778 ACRES THROUGHOUT.

YEAH. I THINK THAT WAS THERE'S A SCRIVENER ERROR ON THAT.

YEAH. ORIGINALLY ORIGINALLY WE HAD A SCRIVENER ERROR ON THAT AND WE GOT THAT CORRECTED.

IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN OKAY.

I GUESS A COPY OF THAT.

IF THERE'S ANY QUESTION AS TO WHAT IT MAY BE, IT WOULD BE YOU CAN MOVE TO ACCEPT IT AS MAYBE AMENDED TO READ 38.77 ACRES THROUGHOUT.

OKAY. AND I'LL JUST CHIME IN HERE REAL QUICK.

THE REASON THAT YOU HAVE THIS PRESENTED BEFORE YOU AND THE PROCEDURE THAT IT IS NOW IS THAT BEFORE THE LAST TIME YOU ANNEXED PROPERTY WAS A LITTLE BIT AGO.

AND THE LAW HAS CHANGED SINCE THEN.

THE LAW NOW REQUIRES THAT BEFORE YOU ANNEX THE PROPERTY, YOU HAVE TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT SUCH AS THIS.

SPECIFICALLY UNDER THE STATUTE, WE HAVE TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT SUCH AS THIS WITH THE DEVELOPER OR OWNER OF THE PROPERTY BEFORE WE CAN ANNEX THE PROPERTY.

SO THIS CONTRACT IS BEING PRESENTED TO YOU IN BOTH OF THESE INSTANCES, SPECIFICALLY UNDER THE STATE STATUTE.

SO THAT'S WHY IT'S COMING TO YOU AS TWO SEPARATE ITEMS. WHEREAS ORIGINALLY WHEN YOU TOOK UP THE ANNEXATION, THE THING ABOUT CITY SERVICES WAS JUST AN ATTACHMENT ON THE ANNEXATION.

THAT WAS A ONE PAGE LITTLE DEAL OF HERE, HERE'S THE STUFF.

NOW STATUTE DICTATES WE DO IT THIS WAY.

OKAY. SO I HAVE SOME OTHER QUESTIONS ACTUALLY, IF THAT'S OKAY.

ONE THAT I HAVE IS WATER SERVICE.

SO OBVIOUSLY THERE'S A NUMBER OF SERVICES THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE PROVIDING ON THIS.

AND WE JUST HAD THE LAST AGENDA ITEM WHERE WE WERE TALKING ABOUT THAT WE DON'T HAVE SUFFICIENT WATER.

SO WE'RE ADDING TO THAT.

AND OBVIOUSLY ALL THESE SERVICES, POLICE, WASTEWATER FACILITIES, ETC., WILL ALL BE PART OF THIS FIRE PROTECTION, WHICH I DON'T THINK IS A BIG PROBLEM.

BUT WATER SERVICE SEEMS TO BE MAYBE A SNAG THAT WAS ACTUALLY INCLUDED IN THE ORIGINAL NUMBERS FOR THE MORATORIUM, ANYTHING THAT HAD A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT OR ANYTHING DOWN THAT LINE, WE INCLUDED THOSE NUMBERS WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.

SO THOSE SHOULD BE COVERED UNDER THOSE.

WASN'T THIS PARTICULAR ONE GRANDFATHERED, SO TO SPEAK, BECAUSE WE STARTED IT BEFORE THE YEAH, WE STARTED THIS ONE I BELIEVE BEFORE THE MORATORIUM TOO.

BUT WE INCLUDED WITHIN OUR THE ORDINANCE ITSELF ANYTHING THAT WAS UNDER A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT OR SOME SORT OF WELL, A DA OF SOME SORT THAT WE WOULD INCLUDE THOSE WITHIN THE NUMBERS THE LOT COUNT BECAUSE WE KNOW THE LOT COUNTS FOR WHITE STONE DURING THIS TIME PERIOD. DURING THAT TIME PERIOD.

OKAY, THAT'S FINE. I WAS JUST CURIOUS.

I DIDN'T KNOW IF THAT WAS INCLUDED BECAUSE I SAY AND THEN THE OTHER THINGS THAT I HAD AND NOT TO MONOPOLIZE, BUT JUST WHILE I'M GOING THROUGH MY LIST HERE.

IT'S OKAY TAKE YOUR TIME.

THERE WAS A COUPLE OF THINGS LIKE A WASTEWATER FACILITIES WHERE IT TALKS ABOUT SEWER SERVICE AND ALL THAT KIND OF THING IT ALMOST LOOK LIKE IT WAS A BOILERPLATE KIND OF AGREEMENT WHERE THOSE THINGS WEREN'T APPLICABLE.

THE SAME THING WITH THE DRAINAGE WHERE IT SAID CITY DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND A BUNCH OF OTHER THINGS LIKE THAT.

SO I WAS JUST CURIOUS IF THOSE SO WHAT THIS DOES IS IT BRINGS THEM UNDER OUR CURRENT DEVELOPMENT CODE AS AND ZONING CODE, SUBDIVISION REGS IS AS IT IS.

AND SO THOSE THAT HAVE SEWER IN THE CITY PURSUANT TO OUR CODE WOULD HAVE SEWER.

[00:20:06]

BUT IF IT IS IN AN AREA THAT DOES NOT HAVE SEWER, IT WOULD NOT HAVE SPECIAL SEWER JUST FOR IT.

OKAY. AND THEN SIMILARLY WITH THE DRAINAGE, I MEAN, CITY DRAINAGE FACILITIES, THAT ISN'T REALLY SOMETHING THAT WE HAVE.

WE HAVE PROPERTY DRAINAGE SOLUTIONS AS OPPOSED TO HAVING A CITY DRAINAGE SYSTEM.

SO ANYWAY, I JUST WHEN I READ THROUGH THIS, I GO THROUGH A FEW AGREEMENTS HERE AND THERE, AND THIS LOOKED LIKE IT WAS A BOILERPLATE AND IT WAS BEING FIT IN.

SO I MEAN, I'M NOT TRYING TO REFUTE ANYTHING THAT'S ON HERE.

I JUST THOUGHT THAT SOME OF IT WAS NOT APPLICABLE.

YEAH. IF YOU GO.

OH SORRY.

I WAS GOING TO SAY IT CONFUSED ME ALSO.

AND I HAD TO COME AND TALK TO OUR ESTEEMED ATTORNEY HERE BECAUSE WHEN HE WAS TALKING ABOUT SEWERAGE, WHEN WE DO NOT HAVE SEWERAGE IN THAT AREA, AND HE SAID, WELL, IF WE HAD IT, IT WOULD THEN APPLY.

BUT SINCE WE DON'T HAVE IT, WE ARE NOT MANDATED TO PROVIDE IT.

DID I GET THAT RIGHT? [INAUDIBLE] WHAT YOU SAID.

[LAUGHTER] IT BRINGS IT UNDER THE CODE.

SO WHERE WE PROVIDE IT UNDER THE CODE WE PROVIDE IT HERE.

WHERE WE DON'T PROVIDE IT UNDER THE CODE, WE DON'T PROVIDE IT HERE.

SO IT POINTS IT BACK TO WHAT WE HAVE IN PLACE AT THE TIME.

OKAY. AND THEN MY LAST QUESTION IS, IT LOOKED LIKE IT HAS A TEN YEAR TENURE.

SO THEN HOW DOES THAT WORK? DO YOU GO THROUGH THIS PROCESS AGAIN IF IT GETS EXTENDED OR WHAT HAPPENS? NO. THE TENURE IS THERE BECAUSE IN SOME SITUATIONS THIS AGREEMENT COMES WELL BEFORE THE ANNEXATION, JUST BASED ON TIMING OF EVERYTHING, HOW IT SHAKES OUT.

HERE, WE'RE ALL GOING TO DO IT IN THIS ONE MEETING, WHICH IS ALLOWED UNDER THE CODE.

BUT THAT DOESN'T THAT'S NOT ALWAYS THE CASE.

SO SOMETIMES THEY WANT TO ENTER A DEVELOPER OR OWNER MAY WANT TO ENTER INTO THIS AGREEMENT TO MAKE SURE IT'S IN PLACE, BUT THEN NOT DO THE ANNEXATION UNTIL LATER.

THE AGREEMENT HAVING A PERIOD OF TEN YEARS GIVES THEM THE TIME TO NOT ONLY COME AND FINISH THE ANNEXATION PROCESS, BUT THEN START THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS AS WELL.

SO IT GIVES THEM THE TIME TO DO THAT AND THE CODE BE APPLICABLE.

IT'S REALLY BOILERPLATE.

IF YOU LOOK AT ANY OTHER CITY, THEY PRETTY MUCH HAVE THE SAME MSA LEGISLATURES KIND OF MADE IT QUITE CLEAR WHAT WE HAVE TO DO.

YEAH, I THINK IT WAS JUST DIFFERENT FOR US BECAUSE WE HAVEN'T DONE ONE THAT UNDER THE NEW LAW.

I THINK THEY DID IT.

I THINK THAT CHANGED IT WAS ABOUT FIVE YEARS AGO.

OH, DON'T TELL US.

BECAUSE WE HAVEN'T DONE ANYTHING.

I DON'T KNOW THAT IT WAS THAT LONG.

I CAN'T REMEMBER. I THINK IT WAS MORE RECENT THAN THAT.

IT WAS 2019. YEAH.

YEAH, THERE WAS SOME CHANGES.

OK TERRY, MICHAEL, DID EITHER ONE OF YOU HAVE? OKAY. CINDY? MADAM MAYOR, I'M GOING TO MOVE THAT WE APPROVE ORDINANCE NUMBER 816 AS IT'S LAID OUT.

I WOULD ADD. CAN WE MAKE SURE THAT WE HAVE THE TYPOS FOR THAT AND FOR THE ACREAGE? OKAY. IS THERE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND THAT. WE HAVE A MOTION AN A SECOND TO APPROVE ORDINANCE NUMBER 816 AS AMENDED.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? NOT HEARING ANY.

I'LL CALL. NOW I'LL CALL FOR YOUR VOTE.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF APPROVING ORDINANCE NUMBER 816.

PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.

ALL THOSE OPPOSED? NOT HEARING ANY MOTION PASSES FOUR ZERO OK.

THE SECOND PART OF ITEM NUMBER SIX IS THE PUBLIC HEARING.

AND I SEE OUT THERE, MR. SOLOMON, IS THERE ANYTHING YOU WOULD LIKE TO SAY? OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FIRST, MAYOR.

OKAY. AND THEN.

OKAY. YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO BE CONSISTENT FOR ME.

[LAUGHTER] AT THIS TIME I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

IT IS 7:24 P.M..

I'LL GO AHEAD AND REQUEST YOU DID IT THE OTHER WAY.

STEVE SOLOMON 4040 NORTH CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY, DALLAS, TEXAS I REPRESENT THE PROPERTY OWNER AND WE ARE REQUESTING ANNEXATION OF THE PROPERTY.

AND THIS IS ACTUALLY WHITESTONE PHASE THREE, WHICH IS A COMPLETED DEVELOPMENT AND THEY'VE STARTED BUILDING HOMES OVER THERE OR AT LEAST SCRATCHING THE GROUND SO FAR.

WE ASK THAT THAT BE ANNEXED.

THANK YOU. OKAY.

ANY OTHER COMMENTS FOR THIS DONIHOO FARMS?

[00:25:06]

NOT HEARING ANY, THEN I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 7:25 OK.

NOW WE WILL TAKE CONSIDERATION AND ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE ACTION ON ORDINANCE NUMBER 817 ANNEXING APPROXIMATELY 38.88? 38.778. OKAY.

THAT ONE IS THE CORRECT NUMBER 38.778 ACRES INTO THE CITY LIMITS.

I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE. THE REASON THERE WAS AN ISSUE WITH THAT, I BELIEVE WE HAD AN OVERLAPPING AREA AT ONE POINT AND WE HAD TO TAKE THAT OVERLAPPING AREA OUT.

THAT WAS THE ISSUE. THAT'S WHY THERE WAS A DIFFERENCE IN THERE.

I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT'S CLEAR. WE'RE NOT MESSING WITH ANYTHING.

IT WAS IT WAS WE WERE LOOKING AT IT AND WE FOUND THAT THERE WAS AREAS THAT WERE OVERLAPPED AND SOME OF IT WAS ALREADY IN THE CITY.

SO IT MADE NO SENSE TO RE- ANNEX THAT PORTION IN THE CITY.

SO WE DIDN'T WANT TO GO DOWN THAT ROUTE.

OKAY. MAKES SENSE.

OKAY. ANY DISCUSSION OR MOTIONS? I WOULD MAKE A MOTION THAT WE ACCEPT ORDINANCE NUMBER 819 ANNEXING APPROXIMATELY THE.

OKAY, WE'LL GET IT RIGHT. I'M LOOKING AT IT SAYS 818 ON HERE BUT.

PICK A NUMBER. [LAUGHTER] SO TO ANNEX THE LOVEJOY NEW VENTURE.

NO. THIS ONE'S DONIHOO FARMS. OH THE DONIHOO FARMS. THE DONIHOO FARMS EXCUSE ME, THE DONIHOO FARMS. THERE'S TOO MANY OF THESE.

BUT DONIHOO FARMS VENTURE AS IT HAS BEEN LISTED IN HERE.

IS THERE A SECOND.

MADAM MAYOR I SECOND THAT.

OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION TO ACCEPT ORDINANCE NUMBER 817 FROM COUNCIL MEMBER REED AND A SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER LYNCH. IS THERE ANY OTHER DISCUSSION [INAUDIBLE] QUESTIONS? IF NOT, I WILL CALL FOR YOUR VOTE.

WE'RE HAVING A BAD NIGHT.

[LAUGHTER] ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 817 PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.

ANY OPPOSE? MOTION PASSES FOUR ZERO.

ITEM SEVEN CONSIDERATION AND OR ANY APPROPRIATE ACTION ON ORDINANCE NUMBER 818

[7. LOVEJOY NEW VENTURE]

REGARDING A MUNICIPAL SERVICE AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 43.0672 BETWEEN THE CITY OF PARKER AND THE LOVEJOY NEW VENTURE, LLC, FOR THE PROVISION OF CITY SERVICES TO APPROXIMATELY 14.926.

IS THAT RIGHT? ACRES OF LAND REQUESTED BY OWNER TO BE ANNEXED GENERALLY LOCATED AT 3501 MCCREARY ROAD IN THE RICHARD SPARKS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 850, TRACTS ONE THROUGH FOUR, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENTS, PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

OK IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? I GATHER THE DISCUSSION THAT WE HAD PREVIOUSLY GOES TO THIS AS WELL AS FAR AS THE AGREEMENT.

BUT THE ONLY QUESTION I HAVE IS, IS THIS PROPERTY UNDER THE MORATORIUM ? RIGHT. OK, SO THEY GOT THE ANNEXATION IN BEFORE THE MORATORIUM WENT INTO EFFECT.

NOW, BEFORE THEY DO PUT HOUSES ON THE GROUND, THEY RIGHT NOW, I DON'T THINK THEY'RE PLANNING TO START CONSTRUCTING ANYTHING ANY TIME SOON. CORRECT? SO IF THEY WERE STARTING TO CONSTRUCT HOUSES RIGHT NOW, YES, THAT WOULD BE UNDER THE MORATORIUM.

BUT THEY'RE NOT GOING TO IN THERE.

I BELIEVE THE OWNER WAS AWARE THAT THERE WAS A MORATORIUM IN EFFECT.

OH, HE WASN'T. I THOUGHT HE WAS OKAY.

I THOUGHT GARY TOLD ME HE WAS OKAY.

BUT WE'RE HOPING TO HAVE THIS WELL COMPLETED THE CONTRACT BEFORE THE MORATORIUMS, BEFORE THEY COME BACK.

SO WHEN YOU LOOKED THAT THIS ONE WAS ALREADY IN, YOU MEAN SOMEBODY HAD SUBMITTED FOR US TO CONSIDER IT PRIOR TO THE FIRST MORATORIUM GOING INTO EFFECT? THE PETITION FOR ANNEXATION FOR THIS ONE WAS FILED JANUARY 12TH.

SO BEFORE THE MORATORIUM.

THE MORATORIUM WENT INTO CAME INTO EFFECT IN MARCH.

OKAY. IF AND GARY, THIS MAY BE A QUESTION FOR YOU OR LUKE.

[00:30:05]

IF A BUILDING, WE WOULD HAVE TO ISSUE A BUILDING PERMIT ONCE THEY GOT READY.

AND THAT WOULD BE CLEAR UNDER THE PROVISIONS BY THE MORATORIUM.

CORRECT. I BELIEVE THEY'RE GOING TO DO TWO ACRE LOTS THERE AND THE MINIMUM SO THAT THEY'D STILL HAVE TO COME GET THAT ZONED AND EVERYTHING ELSE.

SO THERE'S STILL A LOT OF PROCESS THAT HAS TO BE DONE ON THIS PROPERTY FOR THE ANNEXATION.

AND JUST LIKE TERRY SAID EARLIER, THIS IS KIND OF THE OPPOSITE OF WHITESTONE.

THIS ONE'S GOOD FOR TEN YEARS ALSO.

SO THAT'S WHY THAT LANGUAGE IS IN THERE.

SO AS WE GO DOWN THE ROAD, THEIR INTENT IS TO FOLLOW THE CITY REGULATIONS.

OKAY. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION OR QUESTIONS? IF NOT, I WOULD TAKE A MOTION REGARDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 818.

MADAM MAYOR, I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE ORDINANCE NUMBER 818 REGARDING A MUNICIPAL SERVICES AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE BETWEEN THE CITY OF PARKER AND LOVEJOY NEW VENTURE, LLC.

OKAY, WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE NUMBER 818.

IS THERE A SECOND.

MADAM MAYOR I'LL SECOND THAT ONE.

WE HAVE A MOTION, COUNCIL MEMBER LYNCH AND A SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM SLAUGHTER.

IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? IF NOT, I WILL CALL FOR YOUR VOTE.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF PASSING ORDINANCE NUMBER 818.

PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.

ANY OPPOSED MOTION PASSES FOUR ZERO.

NEXT THIS.

YOU WANT IT? FIRST, WE WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE LOVEJOY NEW VENTURE ANNEXATION AT 7:32 P.M.. AND AT THIS TIME, I WILL ASK THE GENTLEMEN WHO ARE INVOLVED IN THIS IF YOU WOULD COME UP AND STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS AND TELL US ABOUT IT. HI, HOW ARE YOU? BRANDON BUSH, 611 REDWOOD CREEK, FAIRVIEW, TEXAS.

AND YEAH, WE'RE JUST LOOKING AT THE PROPERTY THERE AND LOOKING AT DOING TWO ACRE HOME SITES FOR THE STATE HOMES.

YEAH, IT LOOKS LIKE A REALLY NICE SPOT.

ANYBODY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? ARE YOU DEVELOPING OR ARE YOU GOING TO BE DEVELOPING AND BUILDING? DEVELOPING AND BUILDING.

YES, SIR. YES SIR.

THERE IS.

DO YOU REMEMBER WE DON'T HAVE THE EXACT LAYOUT FINISHED.

I THINK IT'S A PRETTY GOOD SIZE.

3 TO 4 ACRES. OKAY.

DID YOU WANT TO COME UP AND SPEAK? YES. SO I'LL JUST INTRODUCE MYSELF.

I'M HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. BRAD [INAUDIBLE] WITH KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES 260 DAVIS STREET, MCKINNEY.

COUNCIL ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS ANNEXATION? GOING ONCE. MR. STANDRIDGE? I'M TRYING TO UNDERSTAND THE VALUE OF THIS TO THE CITY OF PARKER.

IT MEANS THAT WE'LL BE EXPENDING OUR RESOURCES FOR CITY SERVICES.

WHAT'S THE VALUE OF COMING BACK TO THE CITY OF PARKER? WELL, THEY WOULD BE PAYING PROPERTY TAXES.

THEY WOULD BE PAYING PROPERTY TAX REVENUES AND GET THE BENEFITS OF THE CITY SERVICES FOR THAT.

OKAY YOU DIDN'T MENTION ANYTHING ABOUT THAT? YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT THE CITY SERVICES IT WAS APPROVED.

NO, THERE'S AN ANNEXATION AGREEMENT [INAUDIBLE] YEAH.

SO THEY'LL COME INTO THE CITY AND.

YEAH. THEY WOULD BE COMING IN TO THE CITY AND.

YEAH, THAT'S ALL SPELLED OUT.

YEAH IN THE ACTUAL ANNEXATION PAPERWORK.

AND I WENT THROUGH IT IN A LOT OF DETAIL, SO I CAN TELL YOU THAT IT'S ALL THERE.

I THINK THE ONE QUESTION THAT I WOULD HAVE OR IT MIGHT BE HELPFUL FOR YOU TO DESCRIBE IS TELL US WHAT WHAT YOU'RE GOING TO BE BUILDING.

I KNOW YOU SAID YOU'RE GOING TO BE BUILDING HOUSES, ESTATE HOMES, I ASSUME.

GIVE US KIND OF A BACKGROUND INTO WHAT YOU DO AND WHAT YOU INTEND TO BUILD.

SO FOR ABOUT THE PAST 19 YEARS, I'VE JUST BEEN BUILDING HIGH END CUSTOM HOMES.

SO I WOULD GUESS THAT MOST OF THESE HOMES ARE GOING TO BE ANYWHERE BETWEEN ABOUT SIX AND 8000 SQUARE FEET, 3 TO 5 CAR GARAGE HOMES ON TWO ACRE LOTS.

THEY WILL BE EXTREMELY NICE.

WE BUILT A COUPLE IN PARKER ALREADY.

WE REALLY LIKE THIS AREA AND HAVE BEEN LOOKING AT THIS PROPERTY ACTUALLY FOR THE BETTER PART OF SIX OR SEVEN YEARS NOW.

PROBABLY SO, YEAH.

[00:35:02]

FINALLY HAPPY TO BE HERE.

AND THIS IS ADJACENT TO BROOKS FARMS? IT IS, YES, MA'AM. OKAY.

ANYTHING FURTHER FROM ANYBODY? OKAY, THEN I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 7:35 AND COUNCIL ANY CONSIDERATION AND OR APPROPRIATE ACTION ON ORDINANCE NUMBER 819.

MADAM MAYOR, I'LL MOVE THAT WE APPROVE ORDINANCE 819, ANNEXING APPROXIMATELY 14.926 ACRES INTO THE CITY OF PARKER FROM THE LOVEJOY NEW VENTURE ANNEXATION.

OKAY, IS THERE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND THAT MADAM MAYOR. OKAY.

WE HAVE A MOTION FROM MAYOR PRO TEM LYNCH AND A SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER REED.

TRY IT AGAIN.

MOTION FROM SLAUGHTER. OH, SLAUGHTER. I'M SORRY.

[LAUGHTER] I DON'T KNOW WHERE MY HEAD IS FROM.

MAYOR PRO TEM SLAUGHTER AND COUNCIL MEMBER REED.

IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? THEN I'LL CALL FOR YOUR VOTE ON ORDINANCE NUMBER 819.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF PASSING THAT ORDINANCE, PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.

ANYONE OPPOSED.

MOTION PASSES FOUR ZERO.

WELCOME TO PARKER.

NEXT ITEM NUMBER 8 CONSIDERATION AND ON ANY APPROPRIATE ACTION ON RESOLUTION NUMBER 2022 -700

[8. CONSIDERATION AND/OR ANY APPROPRIATE ACTION ON RESOLUTION NO. 2022-700 APPROVING AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN COLLIN COUNTY (CC) AND THE CITY OF PARKER FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS.]

APPROVING AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN COLLIN COUNTY AND THE CITY OF PARKER FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS.

OK LUKE, YOU WANT TO.

I WAS GOING TO HAVE GARY TALK ABOUT THIS ONE.

OKAY. GARY YOU WANT IT? THIS IS THE SAME AGREEMENT THAT WE'VE SIGNED BEFORE WITH THEM FOR A CONTRACT WITH THEM FOR POTHOLE REPAIRS AND THINGS LIKE THAT AT THEIR RATES.

BASICALLY COUNTY SERVICES AT THEIR RATES.

IT'S UP EVERY FIVE YEARS, I BELIEVE, AND IT'S COMING UP THIS YEAR.

SO THE COUNTY WAS THEY KIND OF PINGED US LATE LAST OR EARLY LAST MONTH AND JUST SAID, HEY, WE GOT THIS COMING UP.

WE JUST WANT THEY ARE GETTING ALL THE CITIES BACK ON THE SCHEDULE.

SO THIS IS JUST THE EVERY FIVE YEARS WE HAD TO DO THIS SO TO GET THEIR SERVICES AND GET THEIR RATES ON THAT ITEM.

SO, GARY, I HAVE A QUESTION.

HOW DOES THIS COMPARE WITH THE OTHER CONTRACTS WE HAVE OUT THERE? DON'T WE HAVE A CONTRACT WITH ELLIS COUNTY ALSO? YES, WE DO. COLLIN COUNTY, I BELIEVE, IS QUITE A BIT CHEAPER.

AND HAVE WE USED THEM BEFORE OR? I THINK WE HAVE NOT RECENTLY.

WE HAVEN'T USED THEM IN THE PAST FEW YEARS.

I HAVE TALKED TO THEM ABOUT DOING SOME POTHOLE REPAIRS AND WE ENDED UP DOING THEM OURSELVES.

BUT YEAH, WE'VE, TALKED TO THEM ABOUT DOING SOME STUFF, BUT WE HAVEN'T PULLED THE TRIGGER ON THAT RECENTLY.

I THINK WITH THE ELLIS COUNTY OF THE TEXAS BID CONTRACT.

SO BID MOBILIZATION FEES IN THAT CONTRACT.

YEAH. AND SO WE WON'T CALL THEM OUT FOR SOMETHING SMALL FOR POTHOLES.

COLLIN COUNTY HAS LIKE THAT ZIPPER MACHINE AND THAT TYPE OF THING.

THEY HAVE A SMALL POTHOLE TRUCK THAT'S ACTUALLY REALLY MEAN.

THEY CAN COME OUT AND DO POTHOLE REPAIRS AND DO A REALLY GOOD JOB OF THAT.

BUT CAN THEY DO, FOR INSTANCE, THE OTHER ROADS AROUND IN LIKE LUCAS ROAD AT ONE TIME I THINK WAS DONE BY THE COUNTY, CORRECT? THERE WAS A CONTRACTOR THAT CAME IN AND DID THAT FOR THE COUNTY.

THEY HAVE THE COUNTY CAN DO BIGGER JOBS LIKE THAT, BUT THE RESOURCES ARE SPREAD PRETTY THIN.

THEY DO A LOT OF POTHOLE PATCHING AND THAT'S MAINLY WHAT WE WOULD USE THEM FOR.

IT SOUND LIKE ONE TIME WE WE CHOSE NOT TO USE THEM IS THERE A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF COMMITMENT THAT WE NEED TO OFFER THEM OR IS IT JUST A SERVICE? NO, THEY'LL DO ABOUT ANY SIZE JOB? YEAH. I WANT TO CLARIFY.

IT'S FOUR YEARS. I DON'T KNOW WHY I KEEP THINKING IT'S 2021.

STILL A FOUR YEAR CONTRACT.

SORRY. HEY I GOT THE WRONG MAYOR PRO TEM.

[LAUGHTER] SO WE'RE ALL BACK THERE.

MICHAEL, IS THIS SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE APPLICABLE TO LEWIS LANE? BECAUSE SINCE PART OF THE LEWIS LANE IS THE COUNTY, PART OF IT IS LUCAS AND PART OF IT IS PARKER? YES. OKAY.

[00:40:01]

THE COUNTY COMES UP AND PATCHES THEIR PART AND WE'VE BEEN GOING OUT PATCHING OUR PART.

BUT IF WE WANTED TO HAVE THE COUNTY DO OUR PART ALSO, WE COULD ASK THEM TO DO THAT.

THEY'D GIVE US A NUMBER, AN ESTIMATE OF WHAT THAT WOULD COST, AND THEN WE WOULD SAY YES OR NO, AND THEY'D DO IT OR WAS MORE INEXPENSIVE.

EITHER THAT OR IF WE HAVE THE RESOURCES AVAILABLE TO DO IT OURSELVES OR NOT.

OKAY. AND GARY, ONE MORE QUESTION.

WHEN LUCAS PAVED THE LUCAS END OF LEWIS LANE, WAS THAT THROUGH THE COUNTY OR WAS THAT A SEPARATE COMPANY? NO THERE IS A LONG STORY BEHIND IT.

OKAY. WE'LL TALK LATER.

[LAUGHTER] YEAH.

OKAY. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION OR QUESTIONS? IF NOT, I WILL TAKE A MOTION ON RESOLUTION NUMBER 2022-700.

MADAM MAYOR, I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE RESOLUTION NUMBER 2022-700.

IS THERE A SECOND? I SECOND THAT.

OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM SLAUGHTER AND A SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER LYNCH TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NUMBER 2022-700.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? IF NOT, I'LL CALL FOR YOUR VOTE.

EVERYBODY PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND IF YOU ARE IN FAVOR OF PASSING THIS RESOLUTION.

ANYONE OPPOSED? I JUST THOUGHT I'D ASK IT DIFFERENTLY THIS TIME.

MOTION PASSES 4 0.

THANK YOU. OK.

ITEM NUMBER 9 CONSIDERATION AND ANY APPROPRIATE ACTION ON RESOLUTION 202

[9. CONSIDERATION AND/OR ANY APPROPRIATE ACTION ON RESOLUTION NO. 2022-701 APPOINTING 2022-2024 COURT OFFICIALS.]

2-701 APPOINTING OUR 2022-2024.

THAT'S TWO YEARS COURT OFFICIALS EVERY TWO YEARS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE MAYOR'S TERM OF OFFICE, WE HAVE TO APPOINT OUR MUNICIPAL OFFICIALS.

YOU ALL HAVE YOUR PACKETS IN YOUR PACKET.

THERE SHOULD HAVE BEEN SOME INFORMATION REGARDING THE COURT OFFICIALS.

BECAUSE WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE MUNICIPAL COURT JUDGE, THE MUNICIPAL COURT ALTERNATE JUDGE, THE CITY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, THE ALTERNATE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY AND THE MUNICIPAL COURT CLERK.

AND I NEED CLARIFICATION MYSELF ON ONE THING.

TREY ARE YOU GOING TO BE WILLING TO BE THE ALTERNATE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY? CERTAINLY. LAST TIME YOU ALL DID THIS, MR. SHELBY WAS THE ALTERNATE PROSECUTOR ATTORNEY.

AND I WOULD ASK IN THIS SITUATION THAT YOU WOULD APPOINT ME AS THE ALTERNATE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY.

OKAY. JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE YOU ARE WILLING TO SERVE ON THAT.

OK COUNCIL WHAT IS YOUR WISHES? IS MR. NOAH STILL WILLING TO CONTINUE HIS TERM? BECAUSE I NOTICED HIS INFORMATION WASN'T IN THE PACKET, SO OK.

MADAM MAYOR, I AM INCLINED TO DO WE NEED TO DO THIS ITEM BY ITEM OR CAN I DO ONE MOTION WITH ALL OF THE PEOPLE LISTED? YOU CAN DISCUSS EACH OF THEM, LIKE AS COUNCIL INDIVIDUALLY OR JUST GO THROUGH IT ALL NOW AND THEN ONCE COUNCIL HAS DECIDED WHO THEY WOULD WANT IN EACH BLANK, I WOULD RECOMMEND THAT YOU WOULD MOVE APPROVAL OF THE ORDINANCE AS AMENDED WITH THE NAMES CHOSEN BY COUNCIL.

OKAY.

WELL, MADAM MAYOR, THAT I WOULD MOVE THAT WE APPROVE ORDINANCE 2022-701 APPOINTING THE MUNICIPAL COURT JUDGE RAYMOND NOAH, THE MUNICIPAL COURT ALTERNATE EFREN ORDONEZ.

I'VE PROBABLY BUTCHERED THAT.

CITY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY DAVID HILL, CHANGING OUR ALTERNATE PROSECUTING CITY ATTORNEY TO MR. LANSFORD AND THEN KEEPING OUR MUNICIPAL COURT CLERK AS LORI NEWTON.

IS THERE A SECOND OR? I'LL SECOND THAT MOTION.

OKAY. ALL RIGHT, MAYOR.

WE HAVE A MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM SLAUGHTER AN A SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER REED.

IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS OR ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT IT? SO I HAVE A COMMENT.

THE CITY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, DAVID HILL, HE HAS ACCEPTED TO SERVE ON TO CONTINUE? CONTINUE. CONTINUE TO SERVICE? SO HE'S ACCEPTED TO CONTINUE FOR NOW.

YES. FROM THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, ALL OF THE OFFICIALS HAVE BEEN CONTACTED AND HAVE INDICATED THEIR WILLINGNESS TO

[00:45:03]

CONTINUE SERVING.

THAT IS CORRECT. SO WE HAVE A MOTION AND WE HAVE A SECOND.

AND NOW I WILL CALL FOR YOUR VOTE ON RESOLUTION NUMBER 2022-701. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.

ALL THOSE OPPOSED? NOT HEARING ANY OPPOSE.

THE MOTION PASSES FOUR ZERO.

OK CONSIDERATION AND OR ANY APPROPRIATE ACTION ON RESOLUTION NUMBER 202

[10. CONSIDERATION AND/OR ANY APPROPRIATE ACTION ON RESOLUTION NO. 2022-702 ON CONFIRMING INVESTMENT OFFICERS AND APPOINTING INVESTMENT OFFICIALS.]

2-702 ON CONFIRMING INVESTMENT OFFICERS IN APPOINTING INVESTMENT OFFICIALS.

RECENTLY WE REVISED OUR INVESTMENT POLICY MAKING.

GRANT YOU MAY HAVE TO HELP ME ON THIS MAKING YOURSELF AND LUKE INVESTMENT OFFICIALS MAKING INVESTMENT OFFICERS MYSELF AND THEN TO.

WELL SO THE FINANCE POSITION THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR WOULD BE INVESTMENT OFFICERS AND THEN WE WOULD NEED TO THE MAYOR WOULD AUTOMATICALLY BE A COMMITTEE MEMBER OR INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMBER AND THEN COUNCIL OFFICIALS FOR THE COMMUNITY.

OKAY ARE THE I GOT A LITTLE CONFUSED IN ONE PLACE ARE YOU AND LUKE AND MAYBE YOU'RE A BETTER PERSON TO ANSWER THIS, MICHAEL, BECAUSE YOU WENT OVER THAT PRETTY WELL.

WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN OFFICIAL AND AN OFFICER AND ARE THOSE INTERCHANGEABLE? BECAUSE I THINK THAT'S CONFUSING TO THE AVERAGE PERSON WHEN THEY'RE READING THIS.

I THINK THAT'S WHY WE INCLUDED THE DEFINITIONS IN THE POLICY BECAUSE SO MANY TERMS. SO WE TOOK AWAY THE ONE COUNCILMEMBER BEING THE CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER WITH THOSE DUTIES UP.

SINCE HISTORICALLY, WE'VE ALWAYS DIRECTED OUR FINANCE DIRECTOR TO BE THE FINANCE INVESTMENT OFFICER ANYWAY AND THE IS THERE ANY ANY CLARIFICATION, FURTHER QUESTIONS ON THIS BY ANYONE? IF NOT, I WOULD ACCEPT NOMINATIONS.

CINDY AND MICHAEL, Y'ALL HAVE BEEN ON THAT COMMITTEE IN THE PAST.

WOULD YOU LIKE TO SERVE ON IT AGAIN? I WOULD. I'LL HAPPILY SERVE ON IT AND CONTINUE.

I'D LIKE TO NOMINATE CINDY MEYER AND MICHAEL SLAUGHTER.

YOU ARE AWARE YOU WILL HAVE TO TAKE A PUBLIC FINANCE COURSE.